What about the subscribers on your topics? (Does anyone subscribe directly
to the topic, or is consumption purely from the queues on the virtual
topics?) And are any selectors in use for any client?
I'm curious whether the KahaDB files are cleaned up 1) following a broker
restart, and 2) if you
In a master/slave cluster, only one broker is active at a time; otherwise
you have a network of brokers, not master/slave. Does that describe your
intended configuration?
If so, what you're seeing indicates that both brokers are active
simultaneously. Try to confirm that by hitting both brokers'
Excellent, sounds like a valuable learning experience, which is one of the
things that internships are all about.
On Sep 23, 2015 2:20 PM, "mhempleman" wrote:
> Thanks for your help Tim. It was the application heap size. I upped it to
> 2G and the errors disappeared. I think I didn't see the e
Fixed added
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-12-0-and-SQL-Server-Persistence-tp4702242p4702249.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
Yes, all the queues are empty, enqueue and dequeue counts were off for a
couple of queues, probably, because I purged them.
I am running 5.11.1, all the queues are consuming messages from virtual
topics and advisory messages are disabled.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.22833
Thanks for your help Tim. It was the application heap size. I upped it to
2G and the errors disappeared. I think I didn't see the errors with HornetQ
because I tested on a day whey we had very little data to process. I feel
like an idiot for taking two days to figure it out, but I did learn a lo
I have ActiveMQ 5.12 using Persistence on SQL Server in my development
environment.
I need to setup a staging environment but I keep getting this error.
Note:
>ActiveMQ 5.12.0
>MS JDBC 4.1
>OS Windows 2012 R2
2015-09-23 15:56:49,354 | INFO | Using Persistence Adapter:
JDBCPersistenceAdapter(org
Thanks for the update Tim. I have a scheduled update to 5.11.1. Supposed to
go to production this week.
Once there, as you've advised, we'll be in a better place to diagnose the
problem.
Thanks.
On 9/23/15, 6:13 AM, "tbai...@gmail.com on behalf of Tim Bain"
wrote:
>That's definitely pos
We have two servers where we have two Master(M1, M2)/Slave(S1,S2) setups - M1
is bridged with S2 and M2 with S1; we have also grouped using the multicast
protocol; issue here is that in some cases for certain queue, I am setting
consumers from the slave to master. is this normal?
--
View this me
Hmmm, I think I got it ;) Thanks for clarification!
Best Regards,
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Prefetch-message-consumer-async-listener-and-message-grouping-transactions-clustering-how-does-it-wo-tp4702096p4702231.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mai
Sorry, not all, only the AMQ-AMQW ones. The AMQ1-AMQ2 connection is
already connected in both directions.
On Sep 23, 2015 8:31 AM, "Tim Bain" wrote:
> Try your original configuration with duplex="true" on all
> networkConnectors.
> On Sep 23, 2015 8:15 AM, "atchijov" wrote:
>
>> Hi Tim,
>> So
Try your original configuration with duplex="true" on all networkConnectors.
On Sep 23, 2015 8:15 AM, "atchijov" wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> Sorry for not been clear enough.
>
> AMQ1 has IP 10.0.1.53 and its configuration points to 10.0.1.200:61616
> AMQ2 has IP 10.0.1.200 and its configuration poin
Hi Tim,
Sorry for not been clear enough.
AMQ1 has IP 10.0.1.53 and its configuration points to 10.0.1.200:61616
AMQ2 has IP 10.0.1.200 and its configuration points to 10.0.1.53:61616
The idea is to keep at least one of these two alive at all times... and if
one of them goes down, it woul
I'm having trouble figuring out why AMQ1 and AMQW1 both have a
networkConnector that points to the same endpoint. Can you explain how
10.0.1.53:61616 and 10.0.1.200:61616 map to AMQ1/AMQ2/AMQW1/AMQW2?
Tim
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 6:56 PM, atchijov wrote:
> I am trying to make ActiveMQ 5.12 and
I was hoping that one of the devs (Gary, Tim, Art, etc.) would jump into
this discussion, but since they didn't, please submit a JIRA bug to bring
this issue to their attention. If the problem is that the OpenWire
versions aren't backwards-compatible, that's either a bug (I was under the
impressio
Your efforts are focused on the wrong JVM. The broker's fine, and your
webapp is not, as shown by the two screenshots you shared.
On the broker side, what you're showing looks like perfectly normal JVM
garbage collection, though it looks like Young Gen is only 3/8ths of the
full heap, which is lo
That's definitely possible, if either selectors are in use or the messages
were all sent before any consumer subscribed. EnqueueCount and
DequeueCount aren't very useful for topics; instead, you need to check the
EnqueueCount and DequeueCount on each individual subscription on the topic,
and for t
That can happen if you have topics whose consumers don't consume all the
messages, either due to selectors or due to consumers being offline when
messages are published. (Do you have topics? And are advisory messages
enabled?) If neither of those are the case, there are probably unconsumed
messa
18 matches
Mail list logo