Re: JMS 2.0 support

2015-09-08 Thread Ganesh Murthy
I am not aware of any plans (at the moment) to support it in ActiveMQ 5.x. Thanks. - Original Message - From: "Krzysztof Sobkowiak" To: users@activemq.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 3:20:46 PM Subject: Re: JMS 2.0 support Hi Any plans to support it in ActiveMQ 5.x? Regards

Re: Messages on queue but doesCursorHaveMessagesBuffered = false

2015-09-08 Thread Tim Bain
Not that upgrading to JRE7 would be a bad thing, but I'd say upgrading from ActiveMQ 5.4.2 to 5.12 is probably the more important of the two. Though as you said, it appears to still be a problem at least in 5.9, so there's no guarantee that upgrading ActiveMQ will fix the problem. My suggestion a

Priority Support

2015-09-08 Thread Martin Lichtin
Can someone explain (or understand) why KahaDb implements only three levels of priority?I wish it'd implement a few more, ideally the 10 levels JMS specifies.Also, is there an alternative backing store that implements all levels?

Re: Messages on queue but doesCursorHaveMessagesBuffered = false

2015-09-08 Thread Michiel Hendriks
It's not a JVM GC, but executing the broker GC (which you can execute via JMX) which flushes buffers, etc. And it's flushing of the cursor's prefetch buffer that does the trick. The main annoying thing about this problem is that I cannot reproduce it. And it only happens in our production environm