There are a few fixes (w.r.t KahaDB) in the area of master/slave setup in the
the 5.12 release.
examples -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5549
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4705
All NFS issues might not be fixed but it is definitely an improvement.
- Original Messag
Every message sent to a topic counts as one enqueue, whether it is
eventually delivered to zero, one, or many consumers. (Each message
delivered to a consumer counts as a dequeue, so you could get zero, one, or
many dequeue counts for each enqueue count; do not assume they'll match for
topics!) B
If your master/slave setup uses KahaDB and shared storage, there is a known
possible failure condition where both brokers can become the master if the
slave loses its NFS connection and can no longer maintain control of the
lock. If you think that might have been your situation (if you discover
yo
We have an installed ActiveMQ v5.8 in Master/Slave mode. I am uncertain as
to what type of Master/Slave at this point but I think it could have been
PURE Master/Slave. Our issue is that we are no longer running a slave box
because both systems began fighting for control as Master one day. This
c
Hi everyone,
I'm using version of ActiveMQ 5.6.
While performing load testing of more than 1000 records I am getting below
error:
javax.jms.JMSException: Wire format negotiation timeout: peer did not send
his wire format.
at
org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptio
hi everyone,
I'm using new release of ActiveMQ 5.11
Create Non-durable topic and sending non persistence messages by timer.
there is no listener on that topic.
I see on the Web Console that the message is still Enqueue !!!
I tries some values on the TimeToLive property with no help.
and try to conf
To elaborate on the thread dump, it would be good to know the specific
thread that is using the CPU usage. If using linux, you can run "top -H"
and that will show you the PID of each of the individual threads. You can
then find the PID with the highest cpu usage and convert it to hex. Then
look
Can you take a thread dump so we can see what the various threads are doing?
On Jul 13, 2015 2:40 AM, "Kacu" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange situation with my AMQ 5.9.0. I describe it here:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31314867/activemq-uses-100-cpu
>
> Maybe, someone knows what is wron
Thanks for the update, I’ve managed configuring it with a different approach ,
hope someone will find it useful :
.*NULL.*
.*RC4.*
.*MD5.*
.*DES.*
.*DSS.*
From: christopher.l.shannon [via ActiveMQ]
[mailto:ml-node+s2283324n4698892...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent:
Hi,
I have a strange situation with my AMQ 5.9.0. I describe it here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31314867/activemq-uses-100-cpu
Maybe, someone knows what is wrong?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-uses-100-CPU-tp4699129.html
Sent from the
10 matches
Mail list logo