ANN: Habari Client for ActiveMQ Release 2015.06

24 June 2015 - Habarisoft released a new version of Habari Client for ActiveMQ. Habari Client for ActiveMQ is a STOMP library for Delphi and Free Pascal. It is easy to install and configure, and provides a high-level API, based on connections, sessions, destinations, message producers, and me

Re: questions on virtual topics and failover, useVirtualTopics=true

The thread I was thinking of is http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-forward-a-topic-using-network-of-brokers-td4696688.html#a4696745, though it doesn't mention any attribute along the lines of virtual="true". On Jun 23, 2015 12:20 PM, "breakbad" wrote: > So I simplified my test to remove

Re: Using MessageListener to read up to a limit of message?

Waiting to return from onMessage() till its work is completed on the other thread sounds like it should give you what you want. On Jun 23, 2015 3:53 PM, "Kevin Burton" wrote: > > If you want to pause message acknowledgement and wait before consuming > more > > messages then you should probably us

Authentication - Cassandra Login Module

Dears,just to make you know, I've shared on GitHub the JAAS Authentication Plugin I've just written to integrate authentication with Apache Cassandra. It's is very simple to use, it is Apache Licence 2.0 and I'm actively working on it.check it out here

Re: Is there any way to encrypt connectionPassword in LDAPLoginModule

I just created a jira ticket AMQ-5860. Please take a look at it -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-any-way-to-encrypt-connectionPassword-in-LDAPLoginModule-tp4697979p4698120.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Using MessageListener to read up to a limit of message?

> If you want to pause message acknowledgement and wait before consuming more > messages then you should probably use a synchronous consumer instead and > just call "consumer.receive()" and not try and use a messageListener which > is asynchronous. > I have to move away from synchronous because we

Re: ActiveMQ master-slave topology issue[BUG]

Hi Tim First of all: your suggestions to improve the failover sound great to me. Thanks a lot for your effort in this field. I also highly welcome James' answer that the failover implementation must come along with NFS settings recommendations that work good with the implementation. There are so

Re: questions on virtual topics and failover, useVirtualTopics=true

So I simplified my test to remove the failover portion. Now the client connects to only one broker, subscribes to 'Consumer/testclient/VirtualTopic/foo', then publishes to 'VirtualTopic/foo'. However, no message is received. Viewing the web console: Both topics above have been created, except with

Re: ActiveMQ master-slave topology issue[BUG]

Tim, I thought this was an interesting read: http://www.time-travellers.org/shane/papers/NFS_considered_harmful.html Jim On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 09:45 Tim Bain wrote: > Thanks for the feedback and questions. > > I hadn't considered any of the buffering/flushing/synchronization aspects > of th

Re: questions on virtual topics and failover, useVirtualTopics=true

Thank you Tim, I did some searching but came up empty handed. I also checked the schema (http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core-5.11.1-schema.html#topic) but didn't see anything. Added virtual="true" raised an error. I'm also curious if my MQTT session should have cleanSession=false

Active MQ architecture for Enterprise - Whitepapers if any ?

Can you share any architecture details for Active MQ install for Enterprises. Any whitepaper or case study links will help... Please share details for Master/Slave, monitoring etc... Thanks -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-architecture-for-Enter

Re: Active MQ 5.11.1 MQTT Message is automatically sent to subscriber when it is connected

Hi Tim, I think MQTT messages has RETAINED Flag will be sent to the subscribing clients which not yet received the message. But ActiveMQ 5.10, 5.11: the broker always send the message to the client even the message already delivered to this client before. Thank you, Tim, for your time following

Re: Allowing another consumer to have a message (ActiveMQ-CPP)

On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 08:50:58 +0100, spamtrap wrote: >Hi, > >In some cases we want to allow another consumer to consumer a message >that has already been consumed. The session is opened using >INDIVIDUAL_ACKNOWLEDGE and the message has not been acknowledged. I >have tried closing the session wh

Re: ActiveMQ does not keep durable subscription when re-start

Hi Tim and Tim , 1. Even I set {persistent="true" } in broker or not, the problem is still happened. 2. I use default setting for broker. Please see the xml file attached. activemq.xml 3. For the durable topic subscriber: if