Did you look at this any further? Looking at the code, it looks like the
call will be protected without explicit synchronization by the intrinsic
lock on the synchronizedMap (and I think that some other methods such as
delete() and addMessage() that just call a method on the synchronizedMap
could
Thanks for the information Tim. I tried 'dynamic networks' setup and
the queues are getting created. One thing that I would like to know
is, when should the JMS to JMS connection be used and when should the
Network connection be used? Is there any other difference when using
the dynamic network set
Thanks for your help! I'll fire a ticket for it
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-any-way-to-encrypt-connectionPassword-in-LDAPLoginModule-tp4697979p4697983.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yeah unfortunately it doesn't look possible right now. I pulled up the
source and did some digging and I don't see any current way to specify and
encrypted value. If you want, you can go ahead and put a ticket in on Jira
and I (or someone else) can take a look at it.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:55
Thanks a lot for your reply. I've tried the cached ldap authorization map.
But I still need to set connectionPassoword in cleartext in login.config
file to make it work. I really want to know if it is possible to encrypt
password in login.config file.
--
View this message in context:
http://act
Anything that goes in activemq.xml can be encrypted because of Spring
support (see http://activemq.apache.org/encrypted-passwords.html)
Unfortunately, I do not believe there is a way to encrypt a password in
the login.config file however.
There is also newer way to use LDAP that you could try and
Hi all,
I am using ldap service to do authentication and authorization, and I need
to set connectionPassword for LDAPLoginModule in login.config file. Is there
any way to encrypt this password.
Any response is highly appreciated.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324
On 06/18/2015 10:58 AM, breakbad wrote:
> I'm attempting to setup a simple NoB using the MQTT connector, and durable
> topics/subscribers using MQTT 3.1.1 clean_session=false. Configuring broker
> A to connect duplex to broker B, I'm seeing the following in the logs
> simultaneously:
>
> Broker A
>
I'm attempting to setup a simple NoB using the MQTT connector, and durable
topics/subscribers using MQTT 3.1.1 clean_session=false. Configuring broker
A to connect duplex to broker B, I'm seeing the following in the logs
simultaneously:
Broker A
INFO | Establishing network connection from
vm://loc
I can't comment on the second question, but it's normally recommended to
run the slave broker on a different *host*. Usually you want a slave
because you want redundancy to protect you from failure of all types:
machines dying, machines getting overloaded by other processes running on
them, networ
Hi,
We are on active MQ 5.9.1 version and we are running a JDBC Master Slave
with Lease Database locker. The back end is Oracle (11g rel2) database.
Yesterday there was a scenario where the master lost the database connection
and lost the lock lease. The slave got the lock in couple of seconds an
Can you submit a bug in JIRA for this? If nothing else, it may prompt a
developer who's got some time to go through all the places that counter is
updated and see if there are any code paths that could result in this
behavior. Make sure you describe whatever might have happened between the
last t
Have you set up your dynamically included destinations as described by the
"dynamic networks" section of
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html?
Note that under that setup, messages will be forwarded to the standalone
remote broker only if there is a currently-attached consumer on the
To elaborate more, I am using an embedded broker to gain the benefits
mentioned at
http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-embed-a-broker-inside-a-connection.html.
But I want to dynamically create queues without knowing the name
beforehand.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:32 PM, pubudu gunawardena wrote:
Hi All,
I am quite new to ActiveMQ and am trying to figure out a solution to
the following.
I have an embedded broker and a remote broker.
>From my code I do the following to create a session on the embedded
broker and to create a queue there.
factory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(
I've been doing a lot of work with the metrics and monitoring of the broker
recently so if this happens again in the future and you are able to find a
way to reproduce it I'd be happy to take a look at it.
-Chris
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:12 AM, ALi wrote:
> no it has happen only once ...
no it has happen only once ... and after working a year without any
problem. so it is a bit difficult to reproduce. we will continue monitoring
the metric but without an alert.
thank you tim
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Tim Bain wrote:
> Does this happens reliably and quickly for you?
17 matches
Mail list logo