Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

One warning about using the activemq scheduler is that it requires the use of KahaDB. It doesn’t yet support LevelDB (or replication). So if you go down the scheduler path, you’re stuck with KahaDB… At least for the foreseeable future. On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:14 AM, contezero74 wrote: > Hi E

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

On May 25, 2015 2:51 AM, "contezero74" wrote: > > Hi Tim, > your suggestion was one of the first tentative we perform: but the result > doesn't change. The problem seems very related to the use of the ActiveMQ > schedule-area with a great amount of messages. My suggestion was that you subdivide y

Re: No of consumers per connection in ActiveMQ

Hi ActiveMQ gods, Another ping! Is there any suggestion on what is a good estimate for the number of consumers/producers on a single connection? Thanks, Abhi -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/No-of-consumers-per-connection-in-ActiveMQ-tp4696635p4696903.ht

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

Hi Tim, your suggestion was one of the first tentative we perform: but the result doesn't change. The problem seems very related to the use of the ActiveMQ schedule-area with a great amount of messages. At the moment, we are implementing a work-around based on persistence-queues and application ti