Queue Browser In ActiveMQ-5.10

Hi, I am browsing queue messages periodically using below method: I have list of Queues and I am creating single session for all the browsers. Is this the correct way of browsing or I should use create separate connections/sessions ? public Map> getQueueMessages() {

Re: Broker not delivering persistent messages to consumer on queue

Can anyone suggest what configuration would be causing the broker to go in this state where it is delivering non-persistent messages but not persistent messages on queues? I tried sending persistent messages from STOMP producers but those were also not delivered. This issue is not happening for t

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ 5.11.1 Release

The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ 5.11.1. This release fixes bugs from 5.11.0, including AMQ-5564 which addresses a potential memory leak. Special thanks to Claus Ibsen and Timothy Bish for addressing that issue quickly. And thank you to Hadrian Zbarcea for his ef

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ 5.10.2 Release

The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ 5.10.2. This release fixes a bugs from 5.10.1, including AMQ-5564 which addresses a potential memory leak. Special thanks to Claus Ibsen and Timothy Bish for addressing that issue quickly. And thank you to Hadrian Zbarcea for his

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ 5.10.2 Release

The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ 5.10.2. This release fixes a bugs from 5.10.1, including AMQ-5564 which addresses a potential memory leak. Special thanks to Claus Ibsen and Timothy Bish for addressing that issue quickly. And thank you to Hadrian Zbarcea for his

Re: ActiveMQ 5.11.0 compatible with Java Developer Kit (JDK) 1.8u31 , 64 bit?

guess so - the release-notes of 5.10 already mention Œjava 8 support¹: http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5100-release.html On 18/02/15 10:40, "rabip" wrote: >Hi Geurt, > >thanks for replying. Is it officially supported? > > >Thanks >Rabi > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://acti

Re: DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT is 5x faster even though broker persistent=false

are you using asyncSend - that is applicable to non persistent and transacted messages by default. On 18 February 2015 at 05:12, Kevin Burton wrote: > I’ve had to revert to running with a non-persistent broker for a while > until I can figure out my performance issues. > > In the activemq.xml fil

Re: ActiveMQ 5.10.0 queue slowed down, restart helped

Hi, I am also kind of facing a similar issue where ActiveMQ seems not be delivering any messages to queue consumers (only for persistent messages though). Consumers are not slow and there aren't any fast producers also. http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Broker-not-delivering-persistent-message

ActiveMQ broker is stopping after it is unable to destroy inactive durable subscriber.

Hi, I am getting following error and unable to figure out why is this happening. Can anyone please help? I am using ActiveMQ5.10. --bansalp [20150217 13:43:39.366 EST (ActiveMQ Durable Subscriber Cleanup Timer) org.apache.activemq.broker.region.TopicRegion#doCleanup 92 INFO] - Destroying durabl

Re: ActiveMQ 5.11.0 compatible with Java Developer Kit (JDK) 1.8u31 , 64 bit?

Hi Geurt, thanks for replying. Is it officially supported? Thanks Rabi -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-11-0-compatible-with-Java-Developer-Kit-JDK-1-8u31-64-bit-tp4691632p4691702.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabb

Re: ActiveMQ 5.11.0 compatible with Java Developer Kit (JDK) 1.8u31 , 64 bit?

Yes - it is. Running ActiveMQ 5.11 with jdk 1.8.0_31 on lots of hosts. Regards, Geurt Sent from my iPhone > On 18 feb. 2015, at 08:37, rabip wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Anyone ? > > > Rabi > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-11-0-com