You’re about to write a bug :-P
There should be no minimum and maximum time… in recovery, it could take
5-15 minutes.
Just write a waitForPort() look and try to connect the port on startup and
put some reasonable bound in there. Say 5 minutes.
I usually don’t use connectTimeout though because t
Hi,
Thank you for ur help.
Thanks & RegardsRamesh
> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:59:39 -0800
> From: a...@artnaseef.com
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: jre is enough?
>
> The JDK (Java Development Kit) includes tools for compilation while the JRE
> (Java Runtime Environment) focuses
The JDK (Java Development Kit) includes tools for compilation while the JRE
(Java Runtime Environment) focuses only on running java applications.
JRE is sufficient.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/jre-is-enough-tp4691084p4691085.html
Sent from the ActiveM
Hi,
To start an activemq we must need java I use jdk1.7 and start the activemq 5.10
successfully. But I try to set java home to jre/bin and run activemq it starts
well. I want to know what is difference using jre instead of jdk. If I use jre
any problem arise when processing large data?
Thanks
Hi,
I start the activemq and immediately start the flume using process flume throws
an execption "javax.jms.JMSException: Connection reset" because activemq take
some time to start completely. After some time start flume it does n't throws
exception.
Here I want to know the what is the minimum
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:15 PM, artnaseef wrote:
> Hey Kevin - I really think there's a better way to address your use case
> needs with ActiveMQ that would avoid the turnover of destinations. I would
> welcome the opportunity to help you figure that out.
>
>
Thank. I really appreciate it.
The
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Tim Bain wrote:
> If such a capability was built, maybe it could be extended to handle
> deprecating a broker to allow clients to migrate off of it in preparation
> for taking it offline during an upgrade, which is something Art has
> highlighted previously as an A
I don’t think it does but even if it did I wouldn’t run with the stock
zookeeper distributed with ActiveMQ. There are configuration files,
documentation, etc that should go with it.
Probably best to download a recent version of zk and install it from there.
That’s what we did.
I *DID* check the
Could anyone please confirm if Apache Zookeeper comes with ActiveMQ?
To Setup Clustering, below is the only configuration needed right? No
seperate installation?
http://activemq.apache.org/replicated-leveldb-store.html
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apa
Hey Kevin - I really think there's a better way to address your use case
needs with ActiveMQ that would avoid the turnover of destinations. I would
welcome the opportunity to help you figure that out.
With that said, if you want to implement your own "read-only" destination
feature, it would be r
If such a capability was built, maybe it could be extended to handle
deprecating a broker to allow clients to migrate off of it in preparation
for taking it offline during an upgrade, which is something Art has
highlighted previously as an Achilles heel for ActiveMQ upgrades.
You'd stand up a new
1. As I said in my earlier email, you can download the code, change that
constant, and recompile, or you can split your messages and make your
clients handle that properly (which may be problematic since you need to
ensure that all parts of a given message are consumed, in order, by the
same consum
Hi ,
We are using Active MQ 5.10 version as standalone broker (no cluster).
After few days of run, broker just froze and listeners were not able to
consume messages from the queue. The messages are seen accumulating without
the dequeue count going down.
There are no ResourceAllocation
Hi All,
I'm new user to activemq and mcollective. We have configured activemq with
mcollective and everything works well.
I just want to know how can enable audit logs in activemq - means, I just
want to see the mcollective commands in activemq logs that run previously.
I tried to enable audit l
Hello,
I want to split configuration of the ActiveMQ Broker into two files. The
first one will contain the general configuration of the broker and the other
one will contain a list of predefined virtual destinations. We want to
generate those queues automaticaly based on some external data and so w
Hello,
I followed a tutorial online to implement a custom JAAS-based login module
for ActiveMQ.
Steps:
1) Make the jar, which contains MyCustomLoginModule.class, and copy it into
apache-activemq-5.10.0/lib/
2) Add this to activemq.xml:
...
3) Add this to
Is there a way to mark a destination as read only?
This way I could accept messages on a destination temporarily, and then
mark it read only.
This could be used to decommission a queue or to have clients start writing
to another queue after their messages fail.
Kevin
--
Founder/CEO Spinn3r.co
Good work guys! The explicit only destination stuff looks cool too. I
might have to get some time to look at the plugin model.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> The ActiveMQ team is delighted to announce the release of ActiveMQ 5.11.0
>
> Full details at http://activemq.apache
Another concern here:
As Tim mentioned :
> You need to configure a large maxFrameSize on the STOMP transportConnector
> in your Broker
> configuration, see: http://activemq.apache.org/xml-configuration.html
I looked into the source code of ActiveMQ. I don't think changing the
'maxFrameSize' wi
Thanks, that is true according to Dejan Bosanac
https://twitter.com/dejanb/status/562617699004854272
https://twitter.com/dejanb/status/562597565078994944
Thanks for your feedback. Much appreciated
On 4 February 2015 at 15:33, tbain98 [via ActiveMQ] <
ml-node+s2283324n469104...@n4.nabble.com> wro
Hi,
I am sending the complete stack trace, Please see below:
[I have added 'maxFrameSize' in broker URI, I didn't change anything on
client size: I have tried with and without 'maxframesize' but result is
always same. I am getting below error]:
*[20150204 19:00:54:306
I heard a rumor that 6.0 was abandoning Apollo and was instead going to
merge ActiveMQ and HornetQ. Can any of the primary developers confirm that
rumor?
If it's true, you might think twice about the move to Apollo for which
you're gathering testimonials.
On Feb 2, 2015 12:04 PM, "quintonparker"
The ActiveMQ team is delighted to announce the release of ActiveMQ 5.11.0
Full details at http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5110-release.html
We look forward to your feedback.
A hearty thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
23 matches
Mail list logo