BrowserQueue for non-locked messages

2014-11-21 Thread malcolm.davis
*Background* a. A work queue of messages. b. There are multiple readers of the work queue. c. At anyone time, there are transactional sessions reading messages from the queue, d. or messages that have been delivered to a client, but the message is being processed and has not been acknowledged.

Re: Dispatch policy for ActiveMQ with new message groups? [

2014-11-21 Thread JimCross
No network of brokers. The JMSXGroupID is being used to block concurrent execution of the task. Concurrent execution would cause one process to basically trash what the other one is doing as well as present many opportunities for failure. Your idea about a camel route/server to route the message

Re: ActiveMQ refusing remote connections

2014-11-21 Thread artnaseef
Try the following: * Check the IP addresses each machine resolves for the other * Check each machine for an internal firewall * Use a packet sniffer on each machine and/or a third machine on the network * Try to connect between the machine on another port * Traceroute may tell you if the machines

Re: Dispatch policy for ActiveMQ with new message groups? [

2014-11-21 Thread artnaseef
Are the JMSXGroups required because messages need to be processed in order? If not, remove the JMSXGroups and let messages distribute across the consumers. If ordering is an issue, then it may be necessary to look outside of ActiveMQ to fully solve the problem. For example, it would be straight-

Multicast transport

2014-11-21 Thread mrlem
Hi, I've been trying to use ActiveMQ multicast transport for a couple of days, without success, so I'm posting here in hope someone already achieved this. What I'm trying to achieve: I'm using topics, in a context where there are a lot of publishers and a lot of subscribers, with messages