Yes, that's what i meant but as you already said, it does not work that way.
I just read it is possible to do it programmatically.
Thanks to both, I'll follow your recommendations.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Kahadb-reach-storage-limit-then-producers-
ActiveMQ version 5.10.0
JVM 1.7
Replica LevelDB cluster
Using Queue.
ActiveMQ zkAddress is configured to talk to proxy. Three members zookeeper
cluster is running behind proxy.
When ActiveMQ detects change in Zookeeper group (replace one of the zk
instance with new one). Sometimes it logs message
So for the servers (primary, backup) I don't need any key=value pairs?
For Primary:
For Backup:
For both Primary & Basckup:
For Network Server:
For the client I woul
On 10/09/2014 01:48 PM, pwalter wrote:
Wanted to know what the required activemq.xml configuration is for
ActiveMQ-CPP. We have a Primary (localhost:61617), Backup (localhost:61617)
and another Network server (localhost:61618) that both primary and backup
will connect.
For Primary:
Wanted to know what the required activemq.xml configuration is for
ActiveMQ-CPP. We have a Primary (localhost:61617), Backup (localhost:61617)
and another Network server (localhost:61618) that both primary and backup
will connect.
For Primary:
="/>
For Backup:
In addition to using timeouts, you can also configure the broker to discard
messages when more than a certain number are pending, to avoid blocking
producers; see http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumer-handling.html for
more details.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Andreas Gies
wrote:
> Glad t
On 10/09/2014 03:31 AM, bansalp wrote:
Is functionality similar to TransportListener available for stomp(perl,
python) clients as well?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-on-TransportListener-tp4686170p4686251.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mai
Glad to be of help. If you say "switch to the slave" you don't actually
mean a slave
in a master/slave pair ? - If so you are slightly on the wrong track as
the slave won't
be active at this point in time and not available for messaging.
In my applications i usually sit down with the end users
Is functionality similar to TransportListener available for stomp(perl,
python) clients as well?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-on-TransportListener-tp4686170p4686251.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
