Re: Stomp Client 1.5.4 error creating subscription to topic on JBoss HornetQ (Jboss 6.4.2 GA)

Timothy Bish said that it may have something to do with the destination lookup and that can be configured via the wireFormat... I have started a new thread here: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Need-help-configuring-wireFormat-for-Apache-NMS-Stomp-1-5-4-to-talk-to-HornetQ-td4686002.html -

Re: Error creating subscription

Timothy Bish said that it may have something to do with the destination lookup and that can be configured via the wireFormat... I have started a new thread here: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Need-help-configuring-wireFormat-for-Apache-NMS-Stomp-1-5-4-to-talk-to-HornetQ-td4686002.html -

Need help configuring wireFormat for Apache.NMS.Stomp 1.5.4 to talk to HornetQ

Related to my other post: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Stomp-Client-1-5-4-error-creating-subscription-to-topic-on-JBoss-HornetQ-Jboss-6-4-2-GA-td4685987.html I put in a JIRA issue for the problem above and Timothy Bish replied: HornetQ uses different destination names then the default o

Re: Issue with Active MQ & JMS

It seems like you're having similar problems to the ones ahsanali is having, so the questions I just asked him apply to you as well. Since you haven't shared much info about your configuration, it's harder to suggest where to look, but hopefully you can look through your endpoints and figure out w

Re: org.apache.commons.httpclient.ConnectionPoolTimeoutException: Timeout waiting for connection

It looks like you're failing to get an HTTP connection in one of your routes. Four of the six endpoints you listed use HTTP; have you been able to figure out which of them is the one you're failing on, and whether there's anything unusual about hitting that endpoint? When this fails, are you proc

Re: sometimes java.lang.NullPointerException

Have you tried attaching a debugger to the broker and setting a conditional breakpoint (with the condition that the header in question is null) to see better what's going on? I've had pretty good luck figuring out what ActiveMQ is doing using that approach, so it might help you figure out why it's

Re: Static: network connectors and maxReconnectAttempts

Sounds good; thanks for the explanation. On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Gary Tully wrote: > everything is possible! but they evolved independently, hence the overlap > in functionality > > On 26 September 2014 16:02, Tim Bain wrote: > > > Would it be possible for the failover transport to use

Re: Managing persistent store space

Hi again, as far as I understood (and believe I have observed it in our case) you can use wildcards to qualify the kahadb instance. The instance with no destination qualification is the default kahadb instance. Best regards Andreas On 29/09/14 14:56, petrk wrote: That is an interesting solu

Re: Who will receive messages first virtual topic subscriber or logical queue consumer?

Hi again, the ActiveMQ gods may correct me, but the acknowledgement mode has nothing to do with how the messages are actually dispatched. As I said before - the easiest way to grasp a Virtual topic is to to see it as a group of subscribers acting as one. Technically there is a queue underneat

Re: Managing persistent store space

That is an interesting solution as we do have two streams of messages on our queues, fast one with lots of data and a slow one with more smaller sized messages. Does anyone know if the kaha db adapter supports use of wildcards (i.e. "OrdersForDevice*"), as we have dynamic queuenames. would somethi

org.apache.commons.httpclient.ConnectionPoolTimeoutException: Timeout waiting for connection

technology version I have used: 1. jdk 1.6 2. spring 3 3. activemq-core 5.4.1 4. camel-core 2.5.0 I have used below configuration in application context for activemq pool and jms configuration > class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory" > init-method="start" destroy-method

ActiveMQ broker automatically move messages with same JMSXGroupID to DLQ

Hi, I am wondering activemq's broker can handle the following use case: before broker sending message to the consumer, the broker will detect the dlq, if there is message in the dlq with the same JMSXGroupID as the one is going to be sent to the consumer, the broker will reroute the message to dlq

Re: 5.10.0: Unable to connect via jmx

Hi, there are 4 things to check out in your configuration. 1. The JMX configuration should be done from your wrapper file as someone pointed out. Easier to mantain and goes with the documentation, but it's still "optional" as there are several ways to implement it, and as ActiveMQ's documentation l

Issue with Active MQ & JMS

Hi We are facing below exception in production. Could any body help me out immediately on below error: becz of this error Ques are filling up very fast,, Awaiting for reply::: ERROR processor.DefaultErrorHandler: Failed delivery for exchangeId: ID:as-mm-app1-46371-1411487151507-0:37:1:1:341. Exh

Re: Who will receive messages first virtual topic subscriber or logical queue consumer?

Thanks Andreas So normal acknowledgement that works with persistent messages in case of topics with durable subscriber will not be there in case of virtual topic. Or will it be there and have some other behavior? Any idea on this ? Thanks, Pradeep -- View this message in context: http://acti

Re: Who will receive messages first virtual topic subscriber or logical queue consumer?

Hi I would dare to say thats fairly unpredictable. If you are relying on the order in which multiple recipients of a topic recieve a particular message, then you should reconsider your appliaction design with respect to the message flow. In a nutshell, you can consider each virtual destinati

Who will receive messages first virtual topic subscriber or logical queue consumer?

Hi, I am trying to use virtual topic and am unable to find answer to this question, Can anybody help? *Question*: I am sending to topic "VirtualTopic.Test" and have a logical Queue "Consumer.A.VirtualTopic.Test". I have a subscriber (A) to topic and a consumer (B) to physical queue corresponding

Re: What to use Composite topic or Virtual topic?

Hi Petter, Thanks for stackoverflow link, you have not mentioned that virtual topic should be preffered way but you haven't mentioned why. Are there any performance difference? I need to decide on one of these with a proper answer so that I need not switch in future because of some hidden differe

Re: Managing persistent store space

Hi we had a similar issue in our ActiveMQ broker. The reason was that we had a topic that we use for guaranteed message delivery with message persistence and durable subscribers. Some durable subscribers might be offline and we spotted that even with a few MB worth of messages our persistent

Re: Static: network connectors and maxReconnectAttempts

everything is possible! but they evolved independently, hence the overlap in functionality On 26 September 2014 16:02, Tim Bain wrote: > Would it be possible for the failover transport to use the same > DiscoveryListener mechanism that the static transport uses, but that's just > not how it's be

Re: What to use Composite topic or Virtual topic?

I wrote something about that on Stackoverflow a few days ago. Take a look. If that generic answer is not enough, don¹t hesitate to ask a bit more detailed what you want to achieve. http://stackoverflow.com/a/26052645/412763 BR Petter Den 2014-09-29 07:31 skrev bansalp : >Hi, > >I have a use-