the URI I used is tcp://localhost:61616
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/OpenWire-for-C-tp2525532p4684911.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
thanks for your suggestion. I am now trying AcitiveMq-Cpp, it seems a better
option.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/OpenWire-for-C-tp2525532p4684910.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
thanks for your reply. I just updated vs2008 to SP1, and recompiled all the
dependent libraries. The exception is still there, but other than that, it
seems working well...
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/OpenWire-for-C-tp2525532p4684909.html
Sent from the
I grabbed the OpenWire C client and tried to use it and quickly discovered that
it wasn’t really supported, and it didn’t really work. It was more a proof of
concept.
So I decided to write a C client for OpenWire, by understanding how the
marshalling worked in Java and making it work in a C en
+1
Thanks for all the hard work!
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> Great work Chuck!! Looking forward to seeing this make its way to a 1.0
> release.
>
>
> On 08/21/2014 02:08 PM, Chuck Rolke wrote:
>
>>
Great work Chuck!! Looking forward to seeing this make its way to a 1.0
release.
On 08/21/2014 02:08 PM, Chuck Rolke wrote:
===
* Apache.NMS.AMQP : Apache NMS for AMQP Client Library
* Initial Release Notes
===
===
* Apache.NMS.AMQP : Apache NMS for AMQP Client Library
* Initial Release Notes
===
1.0 Welcome
Welcome to Apache NMS AMQP! This NMS Provider will connect t
Hi, I'm testing ActiveMQ 5.10 trying to migrate from 5.6 in hopes to fix a
variety of dispatching issues I've been dealing with for a while. I'm
running the following topology to verify producer/consumer dispatching on
reconnection works as it does in 5.6. This is my topology:
producer --> br
I can't be too sure about the web.xml installation. Try breaking the syntax
in the file (i.e. put invalid content in the file) and see if it causes
errors - if not, it's not being used (most likely).
The parameter is telling the servlet the URL to reach activemq. That needs
to be set correclty,
I agree that a single connection per consumer is a good starting point. Be
mindful of overall connection counts on the server though, and be sure to
use the NIO connector if those counts will be high on the broker (in the
thousands rather than hundreds). Make sure to count connections from all
cl
Yup - request/reply with temp queues is a good model. With ActiveMQ, it is
important to reuse temp destinations, so choose the right model:
GOOD
- create connection
- create temp destination
- repeat
- send request with reply-to = temp destination
- receive respons
Was there a full exception stack trace? That could help.
It looks like that exception means unexpectedly reaching the end of a list;
perhaps an empty list?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/OpenWire-for-C-tp2525532p4684880.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Use
On 08/20/2014 10:08 PM, levidwang wrote:
thank you, I have just tried using activemqq-cpp. I am using the example
code, and I always found exception:
decaf::util::NosuchElementException
when the code executed to "countDownLatch::await()" (called by
"consumer.waitUntilReady()" in main)
I am a
Hi Jon-
This is an application design question, and is tough to accomplish over a
mailing list. A quick suggestion:
JMS has a request-reply model that uses message headers to specify a ReplyTo
queue. You can do this to solve the “user” problem. Don’t think of it as a
per-user situation, but t
I don’t recommend using pools for consumers, until you have a specific scenario
that a single connection per consumer doesn’t fit your needs. Pre-tuning
usually results in de-tuning when it comes to messaging.
Start with a single connection and single consumer and measure performance
there. Mo
Sophia-
I suggest starting with a single connection per consumer. That model performs
well for most applications. You can then look to add multiple consumers on top
of a connection (maybe 4 max) and then look to add additional connections to
scale consumption.
-Matt
On Aug 19, 2014, at 2:37
My application uses embedded broker active mq 5.5.1, deployed on tomcat 7,
spring 3.4. Some times after delay of 3 to 6 hours after msg delivery,
massage will be processed. This is happening only for one particular queue,
I know for sure there is just one msg sent to this queue. What causes
acti
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out if activemq would be a good fit to broker messages
from a desktop application to a backend services.
In particular what is confusing me is say 100 users log on to the system (I
see activemq has user auth) how do I can manage the users session.
For example, each us
- I have a confusion about installing an AJAX servlet, so I simply created a
web.xml file in my java web application project and assumed that servlet is
installed. AMQ web and amq complete jars are included in the web project. is
it correct or am I suppose to do other configurations to make this wo
One of our spoke machines shows evidence that it is not delivering the
messages to consumers as expected. Of the queues in question is named
"DeliveryNotifications.Inbound" and I've switched on debug logging to
capture what I can.
During the following log segment you can see there are messages for
20 matches
Mail list logo
