Not sure what you mean. The Building section instructs one to run:
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
make install
The note you mentioned refers to warnings you may see after running
autogen.sh.
Doesn't that work for you?
Hadrian
On Tuesday 01 April 2014 20:51:36 naris wrote:
> The web page on bui
The web page on building ApacheMQ-Cpp @
https://activemq.apache.org/cms/building.html does not contain any actual
instructions on how to build the library. Someone should modify it to
include the actual commands that need to be executed to build the library. I
have managed to figure out what the co
Hi,
I am running ActiveMQ 5.9.0 release. I am using AMQP as the protocl and
using apache qpid client to consume messages from activeMQ broker.
Although I have commented out all the protocols except "amqp" in
activemq.xml, still periodically I am seeing the below message in broker log
(standard out
use a small prefetch or 0 and messages will not get stuck pending
consumption by slow consumers.
Dispatch will not exceed the prefetch for a given consumer in both
modes. The real difference is with ordering.
With 0-9 in the queue and 9 consumers with prefetch =10;
- with roundrobin each gets one
To close my previous question, I'd like to say it
seems to work well to let the backend servers connect
to each of the frontend brokers like I planned:
frontend1
embedded broker
queue1 (producer)
frontend2
embedded broker
queue2 (producer)
backend1
connection to fr
Great Christian, thanks!
Best regards
Mike
Christian Posta wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Mike Wilson
> wrote:
> > We're considering using MessageGroups and I have a few
> > questions about it:
> >
> > 1) Is it appropriate to use JSESSIONID for JMSXGroupID
> >in a web scenario?
According to:
http://activemq.apache.org/dispatch-policies.html
queue load balancing use either the round-robin or "strict" method.
Round-robin will give the same amount of work to consumers
independent on if they are fast or slow, possibly leading to work
building up on a slow consumer even when