Dear Distinguished Colleagues:
I need some sort of a redundancy mechanism, and need to brain storm.
I am using AMQ 5.8, here is my problem.
I wanted to set up RDS with multi-zone replication and use that as JDBC
master-slave setup.
Problem is -- AMQ performance is like 10 times slower using
I have tested with redelivery of -1 and 5 and it seems to work in my case. Im
getting infinite with -1 and 1+5 with redelivery of 5.
I seem to recall that redeliveryDelay is not respected, but I haven't tested
it.
Other than that I got issues as described here
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.co
I wonder wether the RedeliveryPolicy on your XA ConnectionFactory works as
expected considering https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4367.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:56 AM, preben wrote:
> A follow up for others.
>
> It seems impossible to use the Activemq JCA adapter with ActivationSpecs
>
thanks for closing the loop on this - for sure it is non obvious
On 20 March 2014 20:05, gilesD wrote:
> "failover://(tcp://myhost:61616)?initialReconnectDelay=100
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid connect parameters:
> {initialReconnectDelay=100} "
>
> I had a similar issu
"failover://(tcp://myhost:61616)?initialReconnectDelay=100
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid connect parameters:
{initialReconnectDelay=100} "
I had a similar issue, the URI is perfectly valid, after looking into the
activemq source I found that when it was trying to set the
Hi Jeremy,
/api/message should be there. At least it is when I'm starting it here.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On
You need to change cursorMemoryHighWaterMark from the default 70% to
100% to ensure you reach your memory limit.
the file cursor will spool to disk when cursorMemoryHighWaterMark is
reached, so you won't reach the memory limit.
the (default) store cursor will stop caching at that value, so you
wo
I had to get a special branch of apollo 1.6 to run with Jetty 9. I am
wondering if I dare to download version 1.7. If not, is there a branch of
1.7 that IS compatible with Jetty 9?
Thanks!
Brian
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-Apollo-1-7-compatible-wi
Hi
I'm working on a poc to where we want to use Activemq as our messagebroker
and Camel as routing engine deployed as war's in Weblogic.
Currently i'm trying integration options with our Weblogic Application
server and JTA using XA since we need it in senarius with different db
integrations.
The
That is the intent. Should be easy to unit test. check the source for
inspiration
On 21 Mar 2014 07:36, "vlaxmi" wrote:
> "the broker entries are overrides for the default values. so if the
> client does not specify a value it will have the default and then the
> broker policy will override that.
"the broker entries are overrides for the default values. so if the
client does not specify a value it will have the default and then the
broker policy will override that. "
-- If the broker config (activemq.xml) has the topicPrefetch set to 500
and if the client does not specify a value - then it
11 matches
Mail list logo