Dynamic destination producers for STOMP

Hi, I am using ActiveMQ v5.8. I am using STOMP 1.1 for my python and perl clients. 1. When I connect my python or perl producer to ActiveMQ broker, it is always considered as dynamic producer, why so ? 2. When I create python or perl *consumer*, it also creates a dynamic producer ? I am not abl

Re: how to wrapper a high level request-response thread-safe library

I think I should deal with something like thread pool. I am familiar with java thread api such as ThreadPoolExecutor, Future, CompletionService. but is there any equivalence library in CMS? On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Li Li wrote: > hi all, > I want to wrapper a high level library using

how to wrapper a high level request-response thread-safe library

hi all, I want to wrapper a high level library using activemq to implement a request-reply service. the user of this library have 2 kind of api --synchronized blocking and asynchronized callback. usage1: MainThread: RequestResponseWrapper wrapper=new RequestRespon

Re: Message Groups and Network of Brokers (Still not supported?)

Christian, Thanks for a quick response. When you mentioned not supported "during faults", did you mean brokers going down within the network, or consumer failures during message processing and subsequent session rollbacks? Please elaborate if possible. Thanks, Greg -- View this message in con

Re: Inflight Count for topics not correct.

Create a test case that can reproduce this, open a JIRA, and attach your test case. On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:24 AM, khandelwalanuj wrote: > Please respond !! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Inflight-Count-for-topics-not-correct-tp4678407p4678583

Re: Inflight Count for topics not correct.

Please respond !! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Inflight-Count-for-topics-not-correct-tp4678407p4678583.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.