Re: Runaway producer: Proper way to clean up a topic?

2014-02-09 Thread artnaseef
Sounds like a very interesting usecase. A network of brokers might help - depending on more of the specifics; for example, depending on the cause of lost connection to the broker, the amount of time for the client to reconnect can vary. I can think of other approaches to achieve what you've descr

Re: Runaway producer: Proper way to clean up a topic?

2014-02-09 Thread jlindwall
I have not reproduced the issue that I regionally experienced sadly. If I do, I will attempt to capture it in a unit test as you suggest. Interesting pont about the short timeout; if we indeed need such a short timeout then persistence is pointless indeed. My requirements are atypical it seems:

Re: Runaway producer: Proper way to clean up a topic?

2014-02-09 Thread jlindwall
Thanks for the advice. I do not really want to blindly delete all messages at startup, though; just the expired ones. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Runaway-producer-Proper-way-to-clean-up-a-topic-tp4677644p4677672.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mail

Re: NMS SSL Client Settings

2014-02-09 Thread artnaseef
Correct - accepting invalid certs is not secure. Your client will connect to any broker using ssl regardless of cert validity in that case. Note I sm being a little vague because I am not certain of the NMS settings. You want the ssl url without the transport.acceptInvalidBrokerCert=true setti

Re: NMS SSL Client Settings

2014-02-09 Thread pwalter
Should this work? (removing the transport) with a valid certificate? From: ssl://localhost:61617?transport.acceptInvalidBrokerCert=true TO: ssl://localhost:61617 I'm concerned that the transport.acceptInvalidBrokerCert=true is not "secure" Thanks -- View this message in context: http://acti

Re: rebalanceClusterClients , failover and transactions

2014-02-09 Thread artnaseef
Try this on the broker transport conntector. updateClusterFilter=nosuchthing Let me know if it does not work and I will double-check the setting. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:08 AM, "Enrico Olivelli [via ActiveMQ]" > wrote: > > Hi, > I'm facing a problem in my system due t

Re: NMS SSL Client Settings

2014-02-09 Thread artnaseef
Are you looking for howto info? To make server cert checking work, the client must trust the server's cert. That means either get a server (broker) cert signed by a known trusted Certificate Authority (CA) or add the CA that did sign the cert to the client's trusted CA list. Sent from my iPho

NMS SSL Client Settings

2014-02-09 Thread pwalter
>From article by Tim Bish I was able to use the following client config settings: ssl://localhost:61617?transport.acceptInvalidBrokerCert=true Currently it won't work without the transport setting.. I need to make this more secure (i.e. not accept invalid Broker) Thanks -- View this message i

Re: Urgent - Broker version 5.8.0 doesn't work with multicast

2014-02-09 Thread artnaseef
Also make sure bridges are setup in both directions. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 9, 2014, at 8:56 AM, "1gnition [via ActiveMQ]" > wrote: > > Hello, > > This is very urgent. I'd appreciate if you can help me quickly. > > I have a configuration of two machines with a single broker on each

Re: Urgent - Broker version 5.8.0 doesn't work with multicast

2014-02-09 Thread artnaseef
Check the bridges using the webconsole and jmx. It sounds like they are just not there. Perhaps turning up logging on the networking code will help to. org.apache.activemq.network=DEBUG That's from memory, so it may need checking. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 9, 2014, at 8:56 AM, "1gnition

Urgent - Broker version 5.8.0 doesn't work with multicast

2014-02-09 Thread 1gnition
Hello, This is very urgent. I'd appreciate if you can help me quickly. I have a configuration of two machines with a single broker on each one. The brokers are connected in a network using multicast. This is the relevant section of the activemq.xml: I run a consumer on each of the two machines