Re: Topic messages enqueued X but dequeued is less than the X

Thanks for replying.. your suspect is correct after seeing the exception more deeply have narrowed down where in the code the connection might be getting closed!! In the progress of fixing it :) Thanks again.. Maurya -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/T

deleting durable subscriber exception

Hi, Getting the following exception when attempting to delete the durable subscriber in the admin console. Using 5.9.0. 2014-02-06 15:25:44,042 | WARN | /admin/deleteSubscriber.action | org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler | qtp1100010806-60 java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.activ

Broker Hangs after some time - or does nothing.

Ah, it's possible to change the subject. Got it. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Broker-Hangs-after-some-time-or-does-nothing-tp4677506p4677514.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ to Apollo

OK, something is very wrong here. On Nabble, I clearly click on "Broker Hangs after some time - or does nothing." but then, reply shows Subject "Re: ActiveMQ to Apollo". Very odd. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Broker-Hangs-after-some-time-or-does-nothi

Re: Broker Hangs after some time - or does nothing.

There are many things to check. First off, I have a little confusion. You metion no log messages on the client or server and then show log messages. By server, do you mean the broker or something else? Troubleshooting steps: * When flow stops, check the broker for active client connections via

Re: ActiveMQ to Apollo

Hey Erik - I think you inadvertently hijacked another thread. Please repost your question by creating a new thread. I would do it for you, but then it won't be linked to you. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Broker-Hangs-after-some-time-or-does-nothing-tp

ActiveMQ to Apollo

Hi, I'm new to this forum and have a few questions as we are evaluating ActiveMQ, Apollo, and other message brokers. Please redirect me if there is a better place for Apollo questions. 1) Apollo is the new ActiveMQ yes? If we want to upgrade from ActiveMQ 1.5...the only upgrade path is Apollo r

Re: destinationPathSeparatorPlugin doesn't work as expected

Okay, I delved into the source code a bit here and here

Broker Hangs after some time - or does nothing.

I am using Activemq-5.10.SNAPSHOT and implementing with replicated leveldb. After few messages consumer stop processing messages. Messages just stay on queue. nothing happens. Client cannot send anymore messges. I dont see any exception on client side. I dont see any exception on server logs. I s

Apollo MQTT QoS 2 issue

Hi I am starting to use Apollo with MQTT, and in testing with Paho and Mosquitto clients I am seeing something strange. When publisher sends PUBLISH with qos=2, Apollo changes it to qos=0. Publisher Apollo Subscriber <-- SUBSCRIBE with qos=2

Re: Defining a Queue to a Topic with ActiveMQ

Yeah; if producer and consumer both use the same kind of destination (both queue or both topic) and they use the same name then there's no need for camel / virtual destinations. Note in activemq you usually don't need to define queue/topic objects; creating a producer / consumer is enough On Wedn

RE: Defining a Queue to a Topic with ActiveMQ

So basically you can have a producer put to a topic called Apples, and the subscriber subscribing to the topic object named Apples, without the need for the queue object. If you want a topic destination created (queueA or queueB), you might consider using Camel routes? -Original Message--

Re: Defining a Queue to a Topic with ActiveMQ

A destination is either a queue or a topic. If you want to consume from a queue/topic and send to a topic/queue the easiest thing is to create a camel route to bridge them. (There's also virtual destinations in ActiveMQ which do a similar thing) http://activemq.apache.org/virtual-destinations.html

Re: Upgrade from activeMq 5.7 to 5.9

Our activeMQ broker is in my control and due to some latest bug fixes we want to move to 5.9. But our consumers/clients are not in our control and they connect to us using http protocol/connector. We have capability to move to 5.9 on our broker and producers but cannot forcefully upgrade our consum

Defining a Queue to a Topic with ActiveMQ

In Hawtio, when I define a topic, how do I define a destination queue to the topic? Or is that in the hands of the publishing application?

destinationPathSeparatorPlugin doesn't work as expected

Hello, We decided to use destinationPathSeparatorPlugin in order to allow dots inside the segments of our destinations i.e. we want to allow destinations like this one: Consumer/foo.bar/VirtualTopic/goo. When we use destinations with slashes everything works fine, but when we add the dots inside

Re: Queue Full exception not thrown on the client side

On 02/05/2014 11:25 AM, Gangadhar Rao wrote: Yes on the broker side we are able to see the error message. But on the client side we are not getting the CMSException for queue FULL scenario. We can definitely upgrade to the latest client version. Just like to know if the problem what I am statin

Re: Queue Full exception not thrown on the client side

Yes on the broker side we are able to see the error message. But on the client side we are not getting the CMSException for queue FULL scenario. We can definitely upgrade to the latest client version. Just like to know if the problem what I am stating is fixed in the latter versions. Thanks, Gan

Re: First chance exception

On 02/05/2014 10:59 AM, cecchinoSMI wrote: Hi to all, I'm tryng to implement different kind of GUIs (producer and consumer), and I have some problem with them, expecially in the Consumer side. So I decided to start with the examples downloaded from the site to verifify if there are the same probl

First chance exception

Hi to all, I'm tryng to implement different kind of GUIs (producer and consumer), and I have some problem with them, expecially in the Consumer side. So I decided to start with the examples downloaded from the site to verifify if there are the same problems, and the response is: AFFERMATIVE. This

Re: replicatedLevelDB not replicating messages

this is similar error I saw after failovers.. you can try the latest snapshots seems much better except for one issue.. see http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Replicated-LevelDB-Store-getting-EOF-exception-td4676541.html -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/

Re: How to configure external file server in ACtiveMQ

There is a mix of levels of technology here. The Operating System (O/S) provides the filesystem. ActiveMQ runs in a JVM that runs "on top of" the O/S. Neither ActiveMQ nor the JVM are involved in choosing a filesystem - that's purely at the O/S level. It is possible to use Samba and have Active

Re: replicatedLevelDB not replicating messages

which version you are using? getting error after failover? I saw some exception during testing with 5.9 most of them are fixed in 5.10 snapshot. Any other exception or stack trace prior to this? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/replicatedLevelDB-not-r

Re: replicatedLevelDB not replicating messages

Actually its weird. It worked from the admin ui but not from my client passing in the persistent flag. On top of that I am now having another issue. Whenever I send a message to the queue, the master errors out. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/repli

Re: Queue Full exception not thrown on the client side

On 02/05/2014 06:08 AM, Gangadhar Rao wrote: We are using the activemq cms cpp library 3.4.5 to send and receive messages from a activemq broker. Description: Queue full exception not thrown on the client side when the queue memory is full on the activemq broker . settings --- producer

How to configure external file server in ACtiveMQ

is there any why to configure external file server like samba in activemq rather than its own file server?. If it is the case can i move the data from producer to file server that i configured directly or data land at activemq server and then transfer to configured file server? Please help me out

Re: Topic messages enqueued X but dequeued is less than the X

Messages for topic subs should only be lost if either the consumer is not staying connected 100% of the time, or a network of brokers is used and a broker in the middle of the flow drops out of the network. Could the consumer be dropping between messages? If the failover transport is used, ch

Re: replicatedLevelDB not replicating messages

There were not before. I submitted a persistent one and now it works. Did not know that, thanks! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/replicatedLevelDB-not-replicating-messages-tp4677444p4677465.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: setting randomize=false doesn't work in failover transport

feel free to add a comment to that issue to that effect. thanks for closing the loop. On 5 February 2014 08:20, 1gnition wrote: > Okay, I wouldn't guess it, but it seems that this issue is covered by this > bug, which has been fixed > in 5.9.0.

Queue Full exception not thrown on the client side

We are using the activemq cms cpp library 3.4.5 to send and receive messages from a activemq broker. Description: Queue full exception not thrown on the client side when the queue memory is full on the activemq broker . settings --- producer flow control is disabled. kahadb persistence

ActiveMQ Connection failed when network failed

Hi, I am using ActiveMQ 5.8. I have consumer app which is running on one server1 and the ActiveMQ is running on another server2 now what happen is because of some network problem ActiveMQ is not available to consumer app and getting below error *javax.jms.JMSException: Could not connect to broker

Re: replicatedLevelDB not replicating messages

hmmm can you check if the messages are being sent persistently ? On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:13 PM, bpoppa wrote: > I do. Here is my config: > > > bind="tcp://10.240.242.233:61619" hostname="10.240.242.233" > zkAddress="10.240.142.24:2181,10.240.242.233:2181,10.240.211.220:2

Re: setting randomize=false doesn't work in failover transport

Okay, I wouldn't guess it, but it seems that this issue is covered by this bug, which has been fixed in 5.9.0. I upgraded and it works just fine. Maybe it's a good idea to add that this bug fix fixes also this issue. -- View this message in con