Re: InactivityMonitor=false not working ?

That did the trick. Thanks Gary ! Geurt Sent from my iPhone > On 28 jan. 2014, at 22:20, "Gary Tully" wrote: > > I think you need: > password="${activemq.password}" > uri="static:(ssl://xxxmlog4:61616?useInactivityMonitor=false)?useJmx=true" > duplex="true"> > > >> On 27 January 2014 23:11

Re: Active MQ 5.3: Unable to Move Messages Between Queues using Active MQ Web Console or JConsole

Hi Guys, Anyone has any idea on this issue? Thanks Shiv -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-5-3-Unable-to-Move-Messages-Between-Queues-using-Active-MQ-Web-Console-or-JConsole-tp4676236p4676929.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive

Re: InactivityMonitor=false not working ?

Could it be "socket.useInactivityMonitor=false"? Looking in transport/tcp/TcpTransportFactory.java: Map socketOptions = IntrospectionSupport.extractProperties(options, "socket."); ... boolean useInactivityMonitor = "true".equals(getOption(options, "useInactivityMonitor",

Re: Is Producer Flow Control Necessary When Sending Persistant Messages?

I recommend leaving PFC enabled, but setting the destination limits to something reasonable. The 20kb limit is definitely too low. Think in terms of percentage of overall heap size. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-Producer-Flow-Control-Necessary-When-

Is Producer Flow Control Necessary When Sending Persistant Messages?

I have a star topology configuration with Broker A feeding the hub in the middle, Broke B, that in turn sends the message on to the final broker, Broker C. I'm trying to simulate a problem I found in production (but I had to scale it down). I'm using ActiveMQ-5.5.1 with JDK1.6.0_21. (Yes I kno

Re: Inactive/Expired CONSUMER

all that is true, however there is way to abort a slow consumer that has been idle or not acked a message in some time. tim did a nice write up. see: http://java.dzone.com/articles/coming-activemq-59-new-way that strategy could be extended to blacklist the consumer ip. Some test at: https://githu

Re: InactivityMonitor=false not working ?

I think you need: On 27 January 2014 23:11, Geurt Schimmel wrote: > Dear all, > > In a network-of-brokers with 2 MQ instances (both ActiveMQ 5.9), I've > configured 'ssl://0.0.0.0:61616?transport.useInactivityMonitor=false&...' > on both machines. > > The connection is set up from host xxxmlo

Re: Problem propagating edits on wiki to main site

Can one of the committers take a look into this ActiveMQ wiki issue below? On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Paul Gale wrote: > Hi, > > I made some edits to the ActiveMQ wiki yesterday here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Pluggable+storage+lockers > where I documented some

Re: Failover and non-persistent messages

1. I have some doubt here. Since non-persistent messages are not written to disk, failing over to the passive broker should lose any messages still in the broker's memory. Does the test use a slow consumer to make sure there is a backlog of messages on the broker at the time of failover? Note t

Re: Inactive/Expired CONSUMER

If there is an errant/inactive consumer on a destination, the best practice is to locate and remove/correct that consumer. Any actions taken to work-around its impact will be imperfect. For example, considering a timeout, what time period would be good to use? Too short and there's a risk of imp

Re: Inactive/Expired CONSUMER

You can use security+ACL to control who has access to consume which queues: http://activemq.apache.org/security.html You can also use exclusive consumer to make sure one consumer is listening: http://activemq.apache.org/exclusive-consumer.html On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:08 AM, vkcse wrote: > H

Problem propagating edits on wiki to main site

Hi, I made some edits to the ActiveMQ wiki yesterday here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Pluggable+storage+lockers where I documented some of the changes 5.9.0 brought to pluggable storage lockers. However, my edits have not propagated over to the main site yet. Can someone

Re: Current Connection Count for ActiveMQ broker

Hi, I am trying to do periodic logging of ActiveMQ stats using plugin. I will log all the stats per minutes. Stats includes: enqueue count, dequeue count, dispatch count, connection count, Producer/consumer count, Durable subscriber count and Dynamic Destination producer count etc. The way I am

ActiveMQ Physical Server vs. VM

If you are using ZooKeeper to handle the new features of levelDB on v5.9, I would think a dedicated NIC would increase performance if this is not shared on the physical server. I wasn't aware that a dedicated NIC could be utilized on a VM. I thought this was shared with all resources on the VM

Re: Optimal memory configuration

Thanks Christian, that's all I needed. Cheers, On 27 January 2014 16:56, Christian Posta wrote: > Hi Bilgin > See inilne... > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have couple of questions regarding memory configurations. I read the > docs > > and coupl

Re: ActiveMQ broker 5.9 doesn't close TCP connection if qpid client close amqp connection

Hi all, thanks for all of your help and fixes. Sry I'm on vacation and afterwards I'm sick :-( I'll will try the fix also, but not yet. Our implementation is switched to "normal" JMS for now. Thanks a lot of your fast help and reply. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.

RE: ActiveMQ on Physical Server vs. VM

If you are using ZooKeeper to handle the new features of levelDB on v5.9, I would think a dedicated NIC would increase performance if this is not shared on the physical server. I wasn't aware that a dedicated NIC could be utilized on a VM. I thought this was shared with all resources on the VM