The code is very similar to that given by activemq:
http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-implement-request-response-with-jms.html
The only thing different in my code is that I use:
replyConsumer.receive(1) to receive the reply instead of implementing
MessageListener on producer side. On th
Hello. I've noticed that on pages like this:
http://hostname:8161/admin/queues.jsp
there are little "purge" and "delete" links there.
It also seems that, once you click one, there is no going back. It
immediately happily purges or deletes that queue for you.
I'll tell you what happens here at
I have taken some thread dumps on the hub and broker.
The first thread dump occurs before the execution of the process which
exhibits the blocking behavior. The remaining thread dumps are taken while
the application is still running but blocked.
The hub thread dumps are at http://pastebin.com/sh
Well, not sure. I would review the test case to make sure it's set up
exactly the way you guys have it.
The goal is to get the test case to lock up somehow so that it doesn't
reach "making progress 99"
Or you could take some time-series (3-4 snapshots) of the broker's threads
(both brokers) so tha
Blarhg! My prior post was out of order.
Thanks!
The updated test runs to completion
I do see this which happened last time to (just this one occurrence during
the test run)
making progress 0
You had an issue sending back messages!
making progress 1
The test run summary looks clean though
Thanks!
The updated test runs to completion
I do see this which happened last time to (just this one occurrence during
the test run)
making progress 0
You had an issue sending back messages!
making progress 1
The test run summary looks clean though
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped:
Fixed, take a look now.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:45 AM, someword wrote:
> The mvn clean install -Dtest=false -DfailIfNoTests=false failed with this
> error http://pastebin.com/mHbPfuKL . However it appears that this didn't
> hamper the test suite from running?
>
> Running mvn test
> -Dtest=o
The mvn clean install -Dtest=false -DfailIfNoTests=false failed with this
error http://pastebin.com/mHbPfuKL . However it appears that this didn't
hamper the test suite from running?
Running mvn test
-Dtest=org.apache.activemq.usecases.TwoBrokerReqeustReplyStompTempDestTest
produced these resu
PFC will hit once you reach a high water mark on the store settings anyways.
Depending on your use-case and whatnot else, it might possibly be a better
solution to re-think the design or drastically increase memory limits.
/je
On Sep 27, 2013, at 10:31 AM, ariskk wrote:
> Just to explain what I
Just to explain what I want to do better:
I want to publish messages continiously. The consumer might run or not (it
can run say once per day). In the mean time I might have collected GB of
published data.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activemq-deadloc
Thanks, when I modify the policy to
I get (after a while)
javax.jms.IllegalStateException: The Session
Can you put together a small stand-alone unit test that can reproduce this
and I can take a look?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:19 PM, eschor...@sendmail.com <
eschor...@sendmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are using a Camel/ActiveMQ/Spring configuration. We have setup a
> persistent queue backed by
Looks like producer flow control...
http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:16 AM, ariskk wrote:
> This occures rarelly (once per day) and creates problems on our production
> servers. When we publish a rather big message (~1MB) using the vm protocol,
> t
Inline...
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Steven Turner wrote:
> Hey Christian,
>
> I have some questions regarding StatisticsBroker --
> 1. We are calculating subscriber stats in the class, Why not publisher
> Stats
> ?
>
Not sure I understand this..
> 2. Can you please tell me the overhead
You must not rely on receiveNoWait to always return a message. What the
method does is check whether any messages have been dispatched to the
consumer AND are *waiting on the consumer's prefetch* This is not the case
in your test above as it takes a few cycles for the broker to dispatch over
your n
Thanks, it worked!
This is what i have on my side in case anyone else will stumble over this
issues:
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";>
Hey Christian,
I have some questions regarding StatisticsBroker --
1. We are calculating subscriber stats in the class, Why not publisher Stats
?
2. Can you please tell me the overhead for collecting stats, would it have
big impact on performance of ActiveMQ.
3. Is StatisticsBroker class thread s
Maybe google will turn up something.
Your best bet is to run the benchmarks yourself on your own hardware and
profile. That will give you the best indications.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:37 AM, johnbing wrote:
> Hey,
> Thanks for the link. Can you please provide me any link which compare NIO
>
Take a look at STOMP protocol. It does a conversion which honors properties
in the message.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:12 AM, tcarlyle wrote:
> We have a software agent that uses JMS to publish messages to an Activemq
> topic. Part of the relevant information of those jms messages are set as
> "
please run following test:
*package com.conceptwave.servicedesigner;
import java.util.Hashtable;
import javax.jms.JMSException;
import javax.jms.Message;
import javax.jms.Queue;
import javax.jms.QueueConnection;
import javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory;
import javax.jms.QueueReceiver;
import java
Hey,
Thanks for the link. Can you please provide me any link which compare NIO
vs TCP transport in terms of throughput and number of threads. It will be a
big help.
Thanks,
John
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:53 PM, ceposta [via ActiveMQ] <
ml-node+s2283324n4671852...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> You can
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Steven Turner
wrote:
> Hi ActiveMQ team,
>
> Could somebody please help me understand the format of ActiveMQ connection
> id and client id. For example, I see this line in broker logs.
>
> 20130926 11:52:52:284 IST (ActiveMQ Transport:
> tcp:///10.240.170.64:40739
Post your client code.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:35 PM, javaG wrote:
> I have a consumer client and producer client. Producer client sends message
> to producer client via a queue and using request/reply message pattern. So
> producer is blocked until a reply comes back from consumer. Most of t
I tried with the latest snapshot (apache-activemq-5.9-20130919.101342) and
everything worked fine. So I think something is missing in the uploaded
patch for AMQ-4312.
Does anyone have a clue about what it could be missing from the patch? What
AMQ packages could be involved? Maybe I could try a dif
This occures rarelly (once per day) and creates problems on our production
servers. When we publish a rather big message (~1MB) using the vm protocol,
the publisher deadlocks here:
prio=10 tid=0x7f2f5008c000 nid=0x1880 waiting on condition
[0x7f303acd9000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAIT
We have a software agent that uses JMS to publish messages to an Activemq
topic. Part of the relevant information of those jms messages are set as
"StringProperties" or "IntProperties" in the message by the JMS agent.
However, I need to subscribe to the activemq topics from Android and there
is no
Awesome. Thanks for the update!
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:55 PM, AlexP wrote:
> Hey, thanks for the reply. We debugged this further and it actually turned
> out to be an issue with a PHP stomp implementation we were using.
> Apparently, when building the SEND FRAME, the PHP implementation was p
Hello,
We are using a Camel/ActiveMQ/Spring configuration. We have setup a
persistent queue backed by Kaha, and transactional configuration using
org.springframwork.jms.connection.JmsTransactionManager.
We are trying to get the exception/re-delivery working correctly, and find
that while the max
28 matches
Mail list logo
