Tim Bish suggested you on IRC take a look at ConsumerEventSource:
http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/advisory/ConsumerEventSource.html
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Oleg Dulin wrote:
> Dear Distinguished Colleagues:
>
> I would like to be able to drop slow consumer
Hi,
Is it possible to set the producerId with ActiveMQ-CPP? If so, how?
TIA.
Check here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1702755/activemq-consumer-producer-connection-listener
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Christian Posta
wrote:
> Tim Bish suggested you on IRC take a look at ConsumerEventSource:
>
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/ad
Thanks for your input. I can take the working example that hits vm:// and
use "tcp://localhost:61616" instead. It works. When I take that same
string and configure glassfish to use it I have the same problem. So, I
have a broker running on port 61616 but still cannot connect to it with
glassfis
Hi ceposta,
I am sorry for this John and Anuj confusion. I was copying and pasting
anuj's reply in this thread to get the context and forgot to remove the
thanks part. I am not Anuj, don't even know who is the guy.
Regarding NIO I am attaching my broker configuration file and thread logs
for you
On 09/13/2013 09:17 AM, Mark wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to set the producerId with ActiveMQ-CPP? If so, how?
TIA.
Producer ID is set by the client using a format that's required for
proper operation with the AMQ broker, you can't change it.
--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
t
yes, I can see it in the log file (& code ofcourse)
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/useJmx-false-two-brokers-getting-exception-due-to-jmx-tp4671456p4671476.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
And in fact they use different storage directories which is visible in the
logs
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/useJmx-false-two-brokers-getting-exception-due-to-jmx-tp4671456p4671477.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Oleg,
You may also be interested in this post
http://timbish.blogspot.de/2013/07/coming-in-activemq-59-new-way-to-abort.html
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 12, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Oleg Dulin wrote:
> Dear Distinguished Colleagues:
>
> I would like t
I am not aware of any such mechanism you're looking for but perhaps these
message limit strategies can help you instead
http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumer-handling.html
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 12, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Oleg Dulin wrote:
> Dear
Hello Lu,
This sounds like a bug to me. Can you please create a JUnit test and raise a
bug report?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 11, 2013, at 11:01 PM, rushalias wrote:
> Here is my setup
>
> I have a master/slave (apache-activemq-5.8.0) configura
This is pretty cool, might want to check it out too:
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/2013/09/apache-camel-broker-component-for.html
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Torsten Mielke wrote:
> Yes there are interceptors in ActiveMQ.
> In AMQ land I don't think we distinguish between interceptors and
12 matches
Mail list logo
