Re: Broker leaks FDs - Too many open files

2013-08-20 Thread DV
We've had similar issue in the past, which went away with the following changes: * adding closeAsync=false to transportConnectors * using nio instead of tcp in transportConnectors * setting ulimits to unlimited for activemq user * fine-tuning kahaDB settings (enableIndexWriteAsync="true" enableJou

Re: Message browsing with Stomp client 1.2

2013-08-20 Thread moret
Issue open, issue resolved for 5.9.0. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4686 Bye! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-browsing-with-Stomp-client-1-2-tp4670514p4670528.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Broker leaks FDs - Too many open files

2013-08-20 Thread Jerry Cwiklik
Thanks, Paul. We are running on Linux (SLES). All clients use openwire. The broker is configured with producerFlowControl="false", optimizedDispatch="true" for both queues and topics. The openwire connector configured with transport.soWriteTimeout=45000. We dont use persistence for messaging. The

Re: Message browsing with Stomp client 1.2

2013-08-20 Thread Timothy Bish
On 08/20/2013 09:18 AM, moret wrote: Hello. I'm using a Stomp client - stompgem - to browse messages on a queue brokered with ActiveMQ 5.8.0. On CONNECT the client declares accept-version:1.0,1.1,1.2 . On SUBSCRIBE the client sends the browser:true header. However this renders a ProtocolExceptio

Message browsing with Stomp client 1.2

2013-08-20 Thread moret
Hello. I'm using a Stomp client - stompgem - to browse messages on a queue brokered with ActiveMQ 5.8.0. On CONNECT the client declares accept-version:1.0,1.1,1.2 . On SUBSCRIBE the client sends the browser:true header. However this renders a ProtocolException on the broker, saying that this featu

Re: AMQ 5.7.0 and interceptors configuration.

2013-08-20 Thread Karel Gardas
Wow! That works! Thanks a lot for your fast help! Karel On 08/20/13 02:41 PM, Christian Posta wrote: try putting the spring namespace in your bean element: http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; id="OpenPMF" class="com.objectsecurity.openpmf.activemq.PMFPlugin"/>

Re: Can I improve throughput by adding connection number to Activemq provider?

2013-08-20 Thread Christian Posta
Sure. What kind of throughput are you trying to achieve? What are you getting with one connection so far? Do you think you're saturating the network connection, or could you get more through the one connection as it is? On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:33 PM, smith_jor wrote: > suppose that applicat

Re: AMQ 5.7.0 and interceptors configuration.

2013-08-20 Thread Christian Posta
try putting the spring namespace in your bean element: http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; id="OpenPMF" class="com.objectsecurity.openpmf.activemq.PMFPlugin"/> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Karel Gardas wrote: > > In 5.7.0 XML schema I don't see plugins

Re: AMQ 5.7.0 and interceptors configuration.

2013-08-20 Thread Karel Gardas
In 5.7.0 XML schema I don't see plugins element defined so I'm still curious how the interceptors.html page may be correct. Anyway, my xml config file is attached. Thanks! Karel On 08/20/13 01:50 PM, Gary Tully wrote: post the xml config you are using and the parse exception. that doco is f

Re: AMQ 5.7.0 and interceptors configuration.

2013-08-20 Thread Gary Tully
post the xml config you are using and the parse exception. that doco is fine... pay attention to the detail in the error and the xml schema - http://activemq.apache.org/xml-reference.html On 20 August 2013 10:58, Karel Gardas wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to configure our specific authorizatio

AMQ 5.7.0 and interceptors configuration.

2013-08-20 Thread Karel Gardas
Hello, I'm trying to configure our specific authorization interceptor into ActiveMQ 5.7.0 and while following http://activemq.apache.org/interceptors.html page I'm neither able to define plugin as an xbean and then reference it in the broker tag/element nor define it in plugins element insid