there is no way to automatically clean them up? If not, ts there a way to
look up the existing message group and run some type of a clean up code?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-message-Groups-Short-living-groups-tp4670060p4670138.html
Sent from the
Yup, it turns out there was a logic error in app2 causing this problem. As
for app1 hitting producer flow control, it's not normally expected, but it
was a frequent occurrence recently given the increased load on app2.
Thanks for your help.
ceposta wrote
> You may want to also look at app2 and s
Thanks Matthew for circling back with the solution to this!
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:58 AM, MattG987 wrote:
> oscarp wrote
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Im trying to use ActiveMQ with IPV6 but Im running into some problems.
> I'm
> > in debian linux, and seems that ActiveMQ(5.5.1) is up and listening IPV
oscarp wrote
> Hi all,
>
> Im trying to use ActiveMQ with IPV6 but Im running into some problems. I'm
> in debian linux, and seems that ActiveMQ(5.5.1) is up and listening IPV6.
>
> tcp6 0 0 :::61616 :::* LISTEN 24671/java
>
> I can make a ping and a telnet to ::1 6161
Perfect, thank you sir.
On 2013-08-06 15:25:16 +, Gary Tully said:
a temp destination is tied to the lifecycle of a connection, unless it
is destroyed via javax.jms.TemporaryQueue#delete it will be deleted
when the connection closes
On 6 August 2013 14:52, Oleg Dulin
wrote:
I do a numbe
Give a quick google for how to do this.
And check out the samples that come with the distribution.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:30 AM, dungvv wrote:
> i want to
> Config ActiveMQ single consumer multiple producers used queue
> Thank for help me
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http:/
I think you're on the right track. As long as you're using exclusive
consumer, only one consumer will be actively consuming from the queue at a
time. You could use individual ack, or you could also use transacted
sessions. By not sending the ack back, your consumer will not proceed to
the next mess
a temp destination is tied to the lifecycle of a connection, unless it
is destroyed via javax.jms.TemporaryQueue#delete it will be deleted
when the connection closes
On 6 August 2013 14:52, Oleg Dulin wrote:
> I do a number of request/response type operations where I send a request and
> I create
I do a number of request/response type operations where I send a
request and I create a temporary queue.
What is the lifecyle of a temporary queue ? At what point does it get
destroyed ?
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
--
Regards,
Oleg Dulin
http://www.olegdulin.com
Hi all,
I am using apache activemq 5.2.0 with ibm java 1.6
My question is , can i continue to use this on Oracle java 1.7?Will there be
any issues if i make the change?
Venkat
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apache-5-2-0-tp4670106.html
Sent from the Acti
We have a use case where there is a single queue that has multiple message
consumers. It is important that the messages are consumed in
first-in-first-out order and message consuming must stop when a message
cannot be acknowledged (e.g. due to an application/database error) and must
not be resumed
i want to
Config ActiveMQ single consumer multiple producers used queue
Thank for help me
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Config-ActiveMQ-single-consumer-multiple-producers-used-queue-tp4670119.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
Hi,
yes by default web socket spec defines same-origin policy and it's enforced
by web server (Jetty in this case). I just found out that there's a filter
that can be used to avoid this
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Feature/Cross_Origin_Filter
so maybe we can make it configurable.
Regards
--
De
13 matches
Mail list logo
