FYI: in 5.9 the broker should handle auto restarting in that scenario.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2013, at 11:08 AM, hbakkum wrote:
> Right, so I've tried to reproduce the issue again, but now the process does
> indeed stop... perhaps I was imagining things :P
>
> However it still does no
I'm a bit confused by the config for Stomp and have found seemingly
conflicting info in the documentation. Please help!
I'm planning to have a stand-alone ActiveMQ server exposed to the public
internet running on a Windows Server 2008 r2 (URL: my.webserver.com). There
will be several local clien
Do you have the web console enabled?
We experienced this same issue a couple times, and we believe it to have
been via the web console.
Since we protected it with user/passwd it didn't happen again.
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:53 AM, SuoNayi wrote:
> Hi, I have enabled simpleAuthenticationPlugin
I had another look and it won't be that simple b/c the
ioExceptionHandler does not restart the persistence adapter, it just
waits for a checkpoint to complete.
There is a JDBCIOExceptionHandler that validates the lock but if it is
not valid it simply exits the broker.
The idea behind the IOExcepti
Right, so I've tried to reproduce the issue again, but now the process does
indeed stop... perhaps I was imagining things :P
However it still does not restart as I'd like. But if I'm interpreting your
previous comment correctly I could achieve this by creating a custom Locker
which wraps and dele
Right, so I've tried to reproduce the issue again, but now the process does
indeed stop... perhaps I was imagining things :P
However it still does not restart as I'd like. But if I'm interpreting your
previous comment correctly I could achieve this by creating a custom Locker
which wraps and dele
Hello,
I'm Pablo, from the IT of the University of Murcia. I'm new to the Message
Queue Services and I've registered here to learn more about ActiveMQ
day-to-day activity.
Also, I've a question about mixing AMQP 1.0 Filters/Selectors. I don't know
how to make a selector for filtering the Priority
Thanks, I got it to work.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-Rollback-function-returns-but-the-server-isn-t-done-rollbacking-tp4668896p4668925.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 07/05/2013 09:52 AM, cineva wrote:
The test was a short version of what I'm trying to do. The following code
depends on the time it takes from the rollback to the second receive. If I
wait a while after the rollback the output is "received received" else it's
"received not received". Is this h
The test was a short version of what I'm trying to do. The following code
depends on the time it takes from the rollback to the second receive. If I
wait a while after the rollback the output is "received received" else it's
"received not received". Is this how ActiveMQ-CPP and ActiveMQ are suppose
Hi,
I'm using a client to publish messages via the ActiveMQ REST API. I have a
single broker configured which is named *master-1*. Each time the broker
receives a message I get the following warning:
WARN | Broker localhost not started so using master-1 instead |
org.apache.activemq.broker.Broke
With some help from dejanb on IRC I figured it out. It was a simple matter
of passing "${jms.queue.audit},my_new_queue" as defaultDestinationName of
the JmsTemplate, so much easier than I thought :)
Best regards,
Elvis Stansvik
2013/7/4 Elvis Stansvik
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've recently been taske
On 07/05/2013 08:22 AM, cineva wrote:
My problem is that I expected to find "Another Test message" in the queue and
not "Test message". If for example I insert a sleep after
session->rollback(); the program runs as expected. Why does
session->rollback(); return but the session isn't exactly rollb
My problem is that I expected to find "Another Test message" in the queue and
not "Test message". If for example I insert a sleep after
session->rollback(); the program runs as expected. Why does
session->rollback(); return but the session isn't exactly rollbacked? Is
this the intended behavior?
It´s great!
I gonna make some tests.
Thanks for reply
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> Hi Leonardo,
>
> yeah, you can use Stomp Java lib to connect to the broker and consume from
> queues https://github.com/fusesource/stompjms
>
> You can find here an example of android
Not entirely sure what you are trying to accomplish here. You always
commit the messages so they are going to get sent, and if you use the
default redelivery policy the messages that a consumer receives but
rolls back will get redelivered.
On 07/05/2013 03:53 AM, cineva wrote:
The following
Yeah, the best way is to create a simple test that demonstrates what you're
experiencing. It'll be easier to spot a problem with it.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
Active
Hi Leonardo,
yeah, you can use Stomp Java lib to connect to the broker and consume from
queues https://github.com/fusesource/stompjms
You can find here an example of android app that does matt to talk to
activemq with the similar lib https://github.com/jsherman1/android-mqtt-demo
MQTT may be a b
the idea is that it will stop and restart and on a restart become a slave again.
What is keeping the java process up? Can you post a stack trace.
We have the logic in the jdbcIoExceptionHandler to stopConnectors and
restart when the lock can be required, but this kicks in when
keepAlive gets an e
Hi, I have enabled simpleAuthenticationPlugin and authorizationPlugin to
protect my brokers from untrusted clients.
Recently our broker is scanned by nessus for security check.I can ensure Nessus
can not know our users and passwords.
However many rubbish queues and topics are created after Nessus
The following program depends on the time it takes to rollback the session.
If I run it in a debugger line by line it returns the correct behavior
("Another Test message" in "testqueue" queue) but if I let it run I get
"Test message". Is this something by design (are only asynchronous rollbacks
sup
21 matches
Mail list logo