I have checked the /apache-activemq-5.8.0/data/activemq.log file for the
same. The size of file is 0 kb.
I tried ./activemq console - nothing is getting displayed.
I checked the /apache-activemq-5.8.0/data folder too. pid file is not
created when I created new file using ./activemq setup.
Any othe
Hi JB,
I got what you have explained. But If I follow what you have said, what will
happen if the broker1 goes down? Assume that all my producers and consumers
connected to broker1.
Rgds,
Mohammed
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-achieve-ActiveMQ
Hi guys,Active MQ broker version: 5.5.1activemq-cpp version: 3.4.1-64 bit.
message type: non-persistentflowcontrol:disabledtransport:TCPBroker
configuration for topic: " producerFlowControl="false"
memoryLimit="100mb" >
How can you tell it didn't start?
When you run ./activemq start it should start in the broker in the
background check the activemq-5.8.0/data/activemq.log file to see if it
started successfully
If your'e expecting output from the console, maybe try ./activemq console
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7
I copied the activemq 5.8 tar file through WinSCP and untar it on amazon
server.
I am not able to start activemq on amazon . Its say pid created but it we
chk status its says Activemq not running. so I tried this steps:
1. creating a configuration file using ./activemq setup newconfig.
2. rename th
HI,
I am running ActiveMQ 5.5.1 and allowing SSL connections. In the logs I am
seeing lot of exceptions as shown below. PLease let me know what could be
the reason for these. Am I doing something wrong in configuration or is it
improper handshake when client doesnt have proper certificate.
2013-0
Thanks Tim.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-8-Active-connections-are-not-displayed-in-Web-UI-tp4667832p4667841.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Ceposta, but I didnt get your question.
I dont think there is any change in the network infrastructure. Also, this
issue happens only after 50-60 messages has been transferred. So it connects
fine, ran fine for some time and then it gave the Broken Pipe Error.
--
View this message in c
I don't believe their currently is... If you want to open a jira and attach
a patch, that'd be great. Would be good to have some tests/usecases too.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Greenbean wrote:
> I am are running in to a case where some XA transactions are getting stuck
> in
> a prepared st
Maybe the kahadb files for that destination became corrupted somehow? Not
sure... is there any chance you can reliable reproduce this? Have you tried
setting ignore corrupted journal setting on kahadb to skip corrupted
sections when starting up the broker?
http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb.html
On 06/04/2013 12:49 PM, manua wrote:
Hi,
I am using ActiveMQ 5.8 (latest version).
In the web UI tab for connections, the active connections are not being
displayed.
Please let me know if I need to explicitly made this setting somewhere or is
this a known bug.
Thanks
Manu
--
View this mess
you got some networking infrastructure taking down connections?
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:41 AM, manua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using ActiveMQ 5.5.1 and publishing data on a topic. There is a SSL
> subscriber on that which consumes all this data. This setup was running
> fine
> for over a year, bu
The failover transport is an excellent choice for failing over to
alternative/standby brokers, however, when used with just one connection
URI, it will attempt to re-connect. You can set reconnection options
(backoff, timeout, etc) on it.
As for half-closed/uncleanly shutdown sockets, take a look
yep, this is expected when using the spring test functionality. your
subclass will inherit the config from parent class which also loads a
broker. take a look at link below to turn off inheritance:
@ContextConfiguration(inheritLocations=false)
http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.x/jav
Hi,
I am using ActiveMQ 5.8 (latest version).
In the web UI tab for connections, the active connections are not being
displayed.
Please let me know if I need to explicitly made this setting somewhere or is
this a known bug.
Thanks
Manu
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.228332
I am are running in to a case where some XA transactions are getting stuck in
a prepared state in ActiveMQ most likely not through a fault of ActiveMQ.
This is causing Kaha data files to not get cleaned up.
I wrote a little code snip that will do a roll back of stuck transactions
while investigat
Hello,
we are running an activeMQ Server version 5.8 with a multi KahaDB
configuration.
We have a lot of different client connectors like Java JMS, Perl Stomp, PHP
Stomp, etc.
1. Issue:
After a few
It looks, that putting ?jms.watchTopicAdvisories=false in ServerUrl of
resource adapter was causing this.
I moved the setting to connection pool instead (as advisories caused
troubles only on sending messages to
temporary queues from remote brokers), and it appears that the server is now
able recov
Hello,
I've run into following issue with ActiveMQ 5.5.1 (fuse-10-16) on Glassfish
3.1.2.2,
two instances running embedded brokers that are connected over network
connector.
During startup of an application I'll get following exception for some of
the MDBs:
[#|2013-05-30T09:14:49.612+0200|WARNI
I don't think this will address Mark's question (but Mark, please
correct if I'm wrong).
If I understand him correctly, he wants the client to know when Broker
X is no longer available, and at that time, kill its current
connection and then keep trying to automatically re-connect to Broker
X until
How to implement Loadbalancing in active MQ. I saw a few articles on
failover, network of brokers etc.
But doesnt server my purpose.
By load balancer I am looking for a solution like for web application we use
apache proxy infront of multiple application server to balance load and
client will get o
Hi,
I am using ActiveMQ 5.5.1 and publishing data on a topic. There is a SSL
subscriber on that which consumes all this data. This setup was running fine
for over a year, but now I am getting,
2013-06-03 12:00:32,827 | INFO | Transport failed:
javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Connection has been shut
Hi
I second Christian.
To get in details, you can do:
Broker1 (LB):
Broker2
Broker3
The client will produce on Broker1. If you have 10 messages on broker1,
those messages will be "forwarded" with 5 on broker2 and 5 on broker3.
Regards
JB
On 06/04/2013 04:41 PM, Ch
Hi Guillaume,
I guess that you didn't overwrite the JMX parameters.
Maybe you have the MBean server created two times (but only one broker).
Take a look on:
http://activemq.apache.org/jmx.html
Regards
JB
On 06/04/2013 06:29 PM, guillaume.sur...@orange.com wrote:
Hi,
I’m stuck with a proble
Yah, looks like it *could* be a race between when the remote part of the
bridge is up and when the broker is trying to forward a message. It would
be best if you can write a junit test and attach to the aforementioned
JIRA. Take a look at the following for help with writing the test.
http://svn.ap
Yah, you could just pick a broker (broker1) and use that URL. But that
won't give you load balancing up front. It would if brokers were
added/removed to the cluster as clients would be rebalanced. I guess in
your specific case you'd have to use all three urls in the failover
transport to achieve b
It happens when we try to add a third broker to the network and after few
seconds we stop the newly introduced broker.
This third broker has the same configuration with respect broker 2.
matteo
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Occasional-Null-Pointer-Exce
Thanks for the reply. But could you tell me one thing, if I have network of
brokers, say broker1, broker2, broker3, which one the the client will
connect to?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-achieve-ActiveMQ-Load-balanching-tp4667798p4667810.html
Sen
Awesome. Thank you! I added 61616 and 61613 to ports allowed over http and
all is well.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Christian Posta
wrote:
> It's configurable, but by default, it's a binary protocol (openwire) over
> TCP. The broker opens up port 61616.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:06 AM,
On 06/04/2013 11:06 AM, Sean Beck wrote:
I am having problems using SELinux and ActiveMQ + Apache together.
Currently I have SELinux disabled and everything works, but I need it
running eventually. I assume I just need to allow the applications to
connect over certain ports, but I'm not positive
It's configurable, but by default, it's a binary protocol (openwire) over
TCP. The broker opens up port 61616.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Sean Beck wrote:
> I am having problems using SELinux and ActiveMQ + Apache together.
> Currently I have SELinux disabled and everything works, but I ne
I am having problems using SELinux and ActiveMQ + Apache together.
Currently I have SELinux disabled and everything works, but I need it
running eventually. I assume I just need to allow the applications to
connect over certain ports, but I'm not positive on that.
Do ActiveMQ-CPP and Stomp connect
Yes, use network of brokers with dynamic failover which achieves what
you're looking to do. See the "Broker side Options for failover" in the
wiki.
You could also take a look at Fuse Fabric which provides similar
functionality using zookeeper.
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
h
When you occasionally see this, does it happen to be upon startup of the
brokers?
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:02 AM, matteor wrote:
>
> ActiveMQ v 5.8.0
>
> We have a two brokers network with duplex network connector and the
> following additional properties:
>
> Broker 1 - networkConnector:
>
> B
How to implement Loadbalancing in active MQ. I saw a few articles on
failover, network of brokers etc.
But that doesnt server my purpose.
By load balancer, I am looking for a solution like, for web application we
use apache proxy infront of multiple application server to balance the load
and clie
ActiveMQ v 5.8.0
We have a two brokers network with duplex network connector and the
following additional properties:
Broker 1 - networkConnector:
Broker 2 - no network connector specified,
Both Broker 1 AND Broker 2 have the following common config entries:
Occasionally, we see the followin
great! I have tested latest snapshot and have not seen this error when I
failover. I do however see that I get a handful of messages stuck in a queue
when I do and I need to move them out and back in to the queue before they
get consumed.
Could this have something todo with that:
2013-06-03 23:50
37 matches
Mail list logo
