Nope, no mechanism at the moment that can change this behavior.
Can you raise a jira with this enhancement?
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:52 PM, DrewB <1a2w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm attempting to use broker redelivery to redeliver messages that could
> not
> be processed initially by the consume
I'm attempting to use broker redelivery to redeliver messages that could not
be processed initially by the consumer. The behavior is expected under most
circumstances, but I've observed some behavior in cases where a broker is
restarted while scheduled retries are pending that won't work for me.
Interesting, I haven't come across trying to do websockets from Java. I'm
guessing your messaging infrastructure won't open up a regular tcp-based
STOMP connector?
I don't think you'll find a Stomp over websockets implementation for Java
out of the box... but I don't think it would be too bad to c
Hi Christian,
Thanks for responding.
Unfortunately the server side messaging infrastructure to which we are
trying to connect only exposes Web Sockets that utilize the Stomp protocol.
How can my Java client use the JMS API to communicate with that server side
infrastructure?
Thanks,
-h
On Tue
1) you don't want to use ws:// for the client side within java.. that
transport's not implemented because it's intended for use in a WebSocket
enabled environment, ie, a browser. Just use the tcp://localhost:X where X
is the transportConnector configured to handle STOMP connections.
2) Use the Sto
Hi,
We are interested in using ActiveMQ's (v5.8.0) Web Socket transport with
Java.
We have been successful in bringing up a broker and running the included
javascript web socket demo. However, we're running into some
difficulty/confusion with how to proceed with Java.
1) Web socket connection
We
Doesn't make any sense. You have producer flow control off, but you're
asking about why you're running into producer flow control.
There are other things wacky about this config.
Are you sure this is the activemq config you're broker is really using?
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Islam Moh
I have a problem when it comes to the ActiveMQ. I need to know where exactly
I can re-configure the Active MQ to avoid the following error.
Note that I am using the ActiveMQ ver 5.5 on Ubuntu 11.10
Usage Manager Memory Limit (67108864) reached on queue://110. Producers
will be throttled to th
We wrote our own java client to monitor queues. I think there is a script
provided out of the box that you might be able to use.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Donald Masanz wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is a way to automatically check to see if there are
> any entries in the Visibility Inbou
Just take a look at the transports that AMQ supports and you will find the
answer by yourself,
http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-transports.html
在 2013-05-21 11:01:34，luodaidong 写道：
>I want to use Active-CPP transfer files between users under firewall，But
>Active-CPP don't support http t
What do you mean AMQ stops running?Does it exit the JVM or stop working as
expected?
PFC and memory usage limit need fine tune if you want the broker to work stably
for weeks.
If you want to see how many pending messages in your destinations or something
else,take a look at
http://activemq.apa
I'm wondering if there is a way to automatically check to see if there are any
entries in the Visibility Inbound queue. We still have sporadic situations
where Apache stops running. We have found documentation on where this could
be caused by the producerFlowControl, however we have not made
I want to use Active-CPP transfer files between users under firewall，But
Active-CPP don't support http transport，anybody can tell me how can I do
this, If there are anther c or c++ client can do this？
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-CPP-firewall-tp4
13 matches
Mail list logo
