Awesome, thanks for the pointer Christian!
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Christian Posta
wrote:
> Using Camel (http://camel.apache.org/) would be easy... or if want to do
> completely within activemq, there is a plugin you could start with
> (ForcePersistencyModeBrokerPlugin) and add some more
Using Camel (http://camel.apache.org/) would be easy... or if want to do
completely within activemq, there is a plugin you could start with
(ForcePersistencyModeBrokerPlugin) and add some more logic to apply to only
certain destinations.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Geoffrey Arnold wrote:
>
On 05/09/2013 02:59 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
If you subscribe, the advisory broker will replay advisories for
destinations, consumers, etc that exist, but the messages aren't retained.
Perhaps I'm getting hung up on the distinction between 'replay' and
'retain.' If the broker 'will replay advisori
>If you subscribe, the advisory broker will replay advisories for
destinations, consumers, etc that exist, but the messages aren't retained.
Perhaps I'm getting hung up on the distinction between 'replay' and
'retain.' If the broker 'will replay advisories for destinations,
consumers that exist'
Nope. messages aren't retained. If you subscribe, the advisory broker will
replay advisories for destinations, consumers, etc that exist, but the
messages aren't retained. If there are no consumers, the messages are
discarded.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Paul Gale wrote:
> There are no sub
There are no subscriptions to the advisory topics at present. Even with no
subscriptions it was my understanding that these messages would accumulate
in memory (or disk) unless consumed. It was this accumulation that I was
hoping to control. I was under the impression that advisory topics were
trea
May want to check the size of topic subscriptions... the enqueue counter
for a topic will always increase as messages are passed to the topic... the
subs are what hold on to the messages and the pending message limit applies
to them.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Paul Gale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
Hello,
We have a composite queue defined as follows:
...
When producers send persistent messages to the `DataQueue`, thos
Hi,
I am trying to configure the use of my advisory topics. Ideally I want to
have them retain advisory messages by time, e.g., 3 days worth, where if
not consumed within that time frame they are purged. This is to prevent
build up of advisory messages. However, I cannot see a way to specify the
l
Not sure... would have to check the camel code... maybe try setting client
id on the connection factory spring bean and see if that works? if so, then
we can narrow it down to camel and i can find the fix.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:02 AM, hengyunabc wrote:
> In ActiveMQ5.5 it works very well, bu
sounds like it should work, but your best bet is to alter Tim's test case (
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/bugs/AMQ3405Test.java?view=markup)
to use same settings you got and get it to fail. then we can figure out
what's really goin
Yah, moving from one Queue (DLQ) to another queue (your analysis queue)
will still cause the same memory build up. Maybe just write a camel route
to put those messages into a database for future analysis?
You're maybe still hitting producer flow control in your tests if your
settings are 100k for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3405Like above issue,I am facing in
my messaging system.I have tried setting enableAudit="false" in activemq.xml
like below.But after re-delivery messages from DLQ messages not coming into
DLQ." producerFlowControl="false"
Thanks for reply .
I have mailed you , please check.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Connection-not-visible-in-ActiveMQ-web-console-tp4666806p4666811.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Christian,
Prior to introducing the 'producer window' both the producer and consumer
were blocked
(If I don't consume from my DLQ) - which was expected.
The temporary work-around I have is to simply increase the memoryUsage to a
higher value
and also ensure messages are not queued up in active
see here:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4499
I fixed some bug, and enhance the web console.
I make a fixed version myself. If you need it, send an Email to
hengyunabc#gmail.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Connection-not-visible-in-ActiveMQ
In ActiveMQ5.5 it works very well, but in ActiveMQ5.8, log:
It seems that there are two threads, but SingleConnectionFactory??
2013-05-09 17:55:21,624 | WARN | Setup of JMS message listener invoker
failed for destination 'spring_test_topic' - trying to recover. Cause: You
cannot create a durable
here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Connection-not-visible-in-ActiveMQ-web-console-tp4666806p4666807.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mail
Hi ,
I am using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 and connections are visible in the connection tab
of web console . What can be the reason ? I checked with ActiveMQ 5.7.0
,it is visible.
Please help.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Connection-not-visible-in-ActiveMQ
19 matches
Mail list logo
