I also tried:
-
Stephen Vincent
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/REST-API-client-ecountering-Status-401-Unauthorized-tp4666184p4666187.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In http://activemq.apache.org/security.html, in the "Authorization Example"
section it says: "The following example shows these 2 plugins in
operation." The word "example" in that is a link to:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/resources/org/apache/active
I have also tried the userid in the form of \ but still get
unauthorized.
-
Stephen Vincent
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/REST-API-client-ecountering-Status-401-Unauthorized-tp4666184p4666185.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
I'm attempting to run a secure broker using release 5.8. on Windows. I was
able to make it work when the broker was on a UNIX machine. But I have
something incorrect when trying to configure my PC. My REST API client
encounters:
Status 401 -- Unauthorized.
Unauthorized: Check userna
of course it will depend on whether the destination will need to persist
the message...
but in terms of performance only, you'll probably find topics to be faster
especially as you add consumers to queues.
but the question you should be asking isn't which one is faster, but rather
what sort of mes
Is there any deference between queue and topic from the point of view of
performance and reliability ?
I would like to use topic if there is small difference between them. Please
give me tips for use queue and topic properly.
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4
Hello there,
I worked out to get the notify from within the same consumer. Just make this
consumer to listen on both the queue and the advisory queue. But now I have
a question is when there two standby consumer and one active consumer, all
are exclusive, is there a way to know which become the cu
On 22 April 2013 21:55, danny-andersen wrote:
> hawt.io is pretty awesome.
Thanks!
> I was learning jquery and knocked this up as a
> training exercise and thought I would share it.
Great stuff.
Incidentally now you've got your head around jquery, I highly
recommend you try learn angularjs - i
Hello,
Thanks for the reply. I could fix with the help of jms.prefetchLimit
parameter. Now, I am more concern about a situation where one of consumer
went down while processing the message. How do I handle this? and what
changes need to be done in the code ? The message is not in the queue and
was