Hi,
Can you please confirm whether i can go ahead with my proposed solution? It
doesn't look to be a very neat solution, but we have a production release
coming up this weekend, so appreciate if you can confirm that it should not
have any negative impacts. Willing to explore any alternate options
Hi,
I am trying to authenticate activemq using ldap.But I am getting this
error.Does anyone have idea about this error?
Error:
INFO | Started SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:8161
INFO | Searching for users with filter: '(&(objectClass={0})({1}={2}))' from
base dn: ou=User,ou=ActiveMQ,ou=system
INF
Hi,
I am running activeMQ broker + JBoss in an integrated environment.
I notice that I do not see Object name filer: org.apache.activemq
from JBoss jmx-console
Can some one point out if there is any config change needed to enable this?
Note: I do see object name: activemq.queue and this lists ou
No, deletion of inactive destinations is not enabled. The only option I can
think of is creation of the DLQ's on restart by adding an entry for each dlq
in . Is that fine? or do you see any better options?
I am operating a cluster of brokers. Each broker connects to its
neighbors as follows (configuration from one of them):
I use a request/response pattern like this:
final Queue responseQueue = this.queueSession.createTemporaryQueue();
requestM
redelivery is managed client side, the broker typically just fires out the
message to a consumer and it is either acked or not. If there is a restart
and the message was not acked it will be redelivered. There is an option to
have kahadb rewrite the message to persist the delivery count
https://is
any chance that deletion of inactive destinations is enabled?
http://activemq.apache.org/delete-inactive-destinations.html
On 3 April 2013 17:08, arjun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We notice that if a queue is not defined in of
> activemq.xml, it does not get created when the broker is restarted.
>
> Our
In 5.8 there is a sync send for all messages across the bridge, so they
wait for an send reply before acking. Prior to that non persistent messages
were sent async.
On 28 March 2013 12:16, miguelhenley wrote:
> I have configurated two brokers in a Wide Area Network: Brokers A and B.
> All
> mes
We dont want to consume messages from the DLQ. We have a monitoring set up
that monitors the DLQ'susing jmx and the monitoring is no longer able to
alert us regarding DLQ messages because the queues are dropped after a
restart.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.
You can start consuming from the DQL (without creating) and get the
messages.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:08 AM, arjun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We notice that if a queue is not defined in of
> activemq.xml, it does not get created when the broker is restarted.
>
> Our actual problem is that DLQ's do not
Hi,
Yes, I will surely give these.
Note that I am not talking about just a spike. I am talking about 100% CPU
all the time. On both the broker (with KahaDb) and the worker (only 10
consumers). There must be something trivial wrong.
Thanks again,
Niels
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The only thing that can shed
Hi,
The only thing that can shed light in the right direction is a series of
thread dumps taken during the 100% CPU spike, with a space of 3-8 seconds
each.
Could you please attach those?
Thanks,
*Raúl Kripalani*
Enterprise Architect, Open Source Integration specialist, Program
Manager | Apache
Hi,
Thanks for your thoughts.
What do you mean with an activeMQ pool? Can you point out a reference?
And why do you think that with only a few events an hour the process would
go to 100% immediately after startup?
We'll check out the load without kahaDb, but note that the worker/consumer
machine
Hi,
Well, these values are used everywhere. We fiddled a bit around with them
some time ago, but it doesn't has any effect at all. This is just the
wrong direction anyway, memory is not the issue here. Well, a leakage
perhaps, but not the available memory. The broker runs within 1MB of
memory but
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:09 AM, nielsbaloe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -Xms512m -Xmx1500m
>
>
Is this all the java options you have? There are more GC java options
available; are you using any of them? Please provide them as well. Earlier
I asked for the java options specified on developer and production
m
I'd be interested in discussing this, as well though we're not there yet but
going to be in the next month or so. You do all have the basic args, yes -
start/max heap (same values), print gc logs, tstamps, dump on oom, compressed
oops might be on by default, etc?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 2,
So, here're a few of my observations and suggestions based on the provided info:
1. use a newer java than v1.7.0_03
2. switch to amq v5.7 or v5.8
3. keep xmx and xms the same and preferably a multiple of 512 megs
4. where are you getting server grade machines with 2 and 15 gig ram
5. when you notic
Hi,
We notice that if a queue is not defined in of
activemq.xml, it does not get created when the broker is restarted.
Our actual problem is that DLQ's do not get created on restart of the broker
although the messages are there in our persistent data store(oracle DB). I
checked this with normal
April 2, 2013 - Habarisoft released version 3.4 of Habari Client for
ActiveMQ, a Delphi and Free Pascal client library for the ActiveMQ
message broker.
New features in this release include improved support for heart-beating
(STOMP 1.1), a new connection parameter to request broker receipts for
I'm developing a cluster that messages must treat non persistence
But the master slave when the master fails the cluster and have to restart
the cluster
Losing all messages in memory.
What can I use? how?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Cluster-high-ava
Hi,
Have any of you have used G1GC with ActiveMQ.
If so, Please share G1GC vmargs recommendation.
Thanks for the Help!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Any-recommendation-G1GC-vmargs-for-activemq-tp4665383.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list arc
Hi,
-Xms512m -Xmx1500m
but before we've set anything, it went wrong as well, and setting it
higher also doesn't help. Note that there are only a few messages going
through every hour, this is not yet fully production, so it should not
even hit the 1% continuously...
Thanks!,
Niels
>
> Niels,
>
Niels,
I am not one of the experts here, but I am a new user of ActiveMQ via
TomEE, and I like to listen in on the mail topics/questions/responses here.
Since I listen in on Tomcat user list as well, I would say that this sounds
like a GC (garbage collection) issue, but I might be mistaking.
Can
Hi all,
We are using activeMQ successfully for two projects now, but we accidentely
discovered that both the broker and the worker/consumer machines are hitting
100% CPU continuously. We do not have this issue on our developers machines
(all Windows 7 laptops). This occurs even when no events are
OK, I figured it out:
The solution is to join the cipher names with "%2C" instead of ",", like
this:
failover:(ssl://…?socket.enabledCipherSuites=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA%2CTLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA…)
Obvious in hindsight. :)
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.228332
Found the answer: "ssl://…?socket.enabledCipherSuites=…"
Note: "socket" for the client, "transport" for the server/broker.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Setting-enabled-SSL-cipher-suites-in-ActiveMQ-clients-tp4665378p4665401.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ
26 matches
Mail list logo