Re: Re:Re: ActiveMQ 5.8.0 Issue with HTTP Connector

I understand that there is a limit on the writeUTF8 method provided by DataOutputStream class but as i understand that there are workarounds for this as well. My question is why isn't ActiveMQ removing this restriction on 64K limit using the workarounds.. To my understanding neither does ActiveMQ

Re:Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

Since the broker has the pending message cursor as well so your messages are reordered by the cursor of the broker at first.Your client may reorder the messages again if prefetch is enabled. The two pending message cursors are fully priority-support so you won't see the fifo order no matter if yo

Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

If your messages are non-persistent, then they won't get stored to kahadb, and kahadb's indexes and the priority categories won't come in to play. Another level of priority is implemented in messages that "have been paged in" or are ready to be dispatched and are in memory (or were never stored to

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

with prefetch size=1 going to 5o messages still maintains message priority... Based on your description I thought the number of reordered messages correlated to prefetch size, am I missing something? My messages are non-persistent. Maybe, the limit on the number of reodered messages depends on the

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

We tried 6 messages 2 of each priority; prefetch was set to 1 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014p4665030.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

Thank you, guys - that explains it. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014p4665029.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

yep, good point. from here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2790 On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Gary Tully wrote: > prefetch is relevant here. the pending cursor on the client has priority > support[0-9] so x prefetched messages with priority [0-5] will get > reordered on the cl

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

prefetch is relevant here. the pending cursor on the client has priority support[0-9] so x prefetched messages with priority [0-5] will get reordered on the client. with prefetch=0, the order will be fifo. Note: the jdbc store does priority order [0-9] On 21 March 2013 15:38, mikmela wrote: >

Re: Re: Re:How to set network connector between to secure activemq broker?

We have embedded activemq brokers attached to our software and we let users connect those together to form a network of brokers from a specific instance. We don't want users to go to the other remote instance and create a network connector. HTH Isn't there anyway to workaround this issue? Relating

Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

How many messages did you try? THere is a btree for each priority level (low, default, high) in kahadb, so I don't think you can rely on the ordering in a particular range On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:38 AM, mikmela wrote: > The http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html >

Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed

The http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html says that *For KahaDB three priority levels are supported, Low (<5), Default (=5) and High (>5).*. However, our tests show that messages with different priori

Re: ActiveMQ and JMS

TopicListener.java Hi, I have created messages and have sent and recieved them using activemq as the jms provider. If I would like to connect these jms codes(pub/sub) to different web-services? Any code or how to do so would

Re: Re:load balancing for a few identical queues

Many thanks )) I found post with identical approach, when using alone queue with a few consumers. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/load-balancing-for-a-few-identical-queues-tp4664879p4664998.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.