Problems With Using ActiveMQ Web Console on Karaf 2.3.1 (Equinox)

2013-03-06 Thread gcollins
Hi, I am having problems running the ActiveMQ web console with Karaf 2.3.1 (equinox 3.8). I get the stack trace below. Everything works fine if I use Felix instead. Anything special that needs to be done to work with Equinox? I see a similar issue has been reported before: https://issues.apache.o

Re:Re: How to ensure LevelDB store uses a JNI driver

2013-03-06 Thread SuoNayi
I have some confusions not answered until now: 1. A leveldb driver( pure java driver or the jni driver) seems like a jdbc driver, it can not save the data without talking to the store engine(database). For the jni driver, does it will find the installed LevelDB on the broker at first?

Re:Re: Best protocol & network interface binding

2013-03-06 Thread SuoNayi
Yes, this feature is discovered by digging the source code and you can not find any docs/pages to mention that currently. Maybe someone can add a entry in the FAQ. I had tested it last year and there are 8 network interfaces on that server, I had to specify the local address to bind to communica

Re: ActiveMQ commercial/enterprise users

2013-03-06 Thread Christian Posta
There are A LOT. They don't all come out and say, but you can check the fusesource.com website for a handful. On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:55 AM, KMUser wrote: > Hello- Is there a way to find out which companies are using ActiveMQ? We > are > a medium sized shop and would like to find out AMQ's ma

ActiveMQ commercial/enterprise users

2013-03-06 Thread KMUser
Hello- Is there a way to find out which companies are using ActiveMQ? We are a medium sized shop and would like to find out AMQ's market penetration. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-commercial-enterprise-users-tp4664443.html Sent from the

Re: org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportDisposedIOException: Peer (vm://broker#56570) disposed.

2013-03-06 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-03-04, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2013-03-04, Christian Posta wrote: >> Looks like the client side transport is considered disposed when the broker >> is trying to send it a message after connection.close() has been initiated. >> What version are you using? > > the version is 5.7.something.

Re: Best protocol & network interface binding

2013-03-06 Thread Raúl Kripalani
Yes, you're right. You can force the socket to bind to a particular Network Interface. But this is done to override the primary decision the OS takes based on its routing tables. Furthermore, by making the application layer participate in the IP routing, you likely end up with fragile code and -

Re: Best protocol & network interface binding

2013-03-06 Thread Christian Posta
Did you try SuoNayi's suggestion? That should work... On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:04 AM, jan wrote: > When I open a socket in Java to send/receive data, I can do the following: > > // open socket > dc = DatagramChannel.open(StandardProtocolFamily.INET6); > > // set options ... > > // bind to IP.

Re: How to ensure LevelDB store uses a JNI driver

2013-03-06 Thread Christian Posta
Apollo does this. I think the logs are coming from the leveldb store, so when using with ActiveMQ 5.x it should be the same (but i didn't try yet). It will only log if NOT using the JNI impl. On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:00 AM, SuoNayi wrote: >

Re: Best protocol & network interface binding

2013-03-06 Thread jan
When I open a socket in Java to send/receive data, I can do the following: // open socket dc = DatagramChannel.open(StandardProtocolFamily.INET6); // set options ... // bind to IP. The SocketAddress comes from the network-interface using // NetworkInterface.getByName(networkIntf) dc.bind(socke

Re: Best protocol & network interface binding

2013-03-06 Thread Raúl Kripalani
I'm not sure the JVM can do much here, and by extension the AMQ client library. The JVM asks the OS for a network socket to communicate with an IP, and the OS queries its routing tables to select the network adapter to route traffic through. So in my opinion, you'll need to configure your OS ro

Re: Best protocol & network interface binding

2013-03-06 Thread jan
No no, it is all on the client-side. I need to bind the message-listener to the network-interface, not the broker! The server can bind to the IPs, that's not the issue. But how does the client listen dedicated to a network-interface? Greetings Jan -- View this message in context: http://active

Message redelivery to multiple consumers

2013-03-06 Thread spam trap
We need to allow message redelivery to multiple consumers of the same queue. The consumers stop and restart/recover the session when they need. Unacknowledged messages need to be consumed by any consumer. We have set the broker up according to the instructions in the page http://activemq.apache.o

Re: Web Console does not show any active connections

2013-03-06 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi Karl, sounds like a bug. Can you raise Jira for it, so we can investigate? Regards -- Dejan Bosanac -- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat dbosa...@redhat.com Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On Tue,