Lease based locker fails as slave starts when master is still up

Hi Team, We recently switched to AMQ5.7.0 after reading posts in AMQ-3654 and reading about lease locker mechanism. We have implemented this mechanism in our AMQ setup. We are facing some strange issue with this mechanism. The issue is, at some point after master and slave running for quite some

Re: Broker Leak

Bad choice of words.. not "destined" but could run out of memory if consumers cannot keep up with producers On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Christian Posta wrote: > So i guess in general i would think that a configuration with no PFC, vm > cursors, and no persistence is destined to run out of m

Re: Broker Leak

So i guess in general i would think that a configuration with no PFC, vm cursors, and no persistence is destined to run out of memory. I wonder if what's happening in your case is these temporary queues are getting filled with messages that aren't being consumed and then when the reference hangs a

Re: I see defaultReadTimeout=-1 in MessageServlet.java, but experience 20 secs.

I looked deeper into "MessageServlet.java" and see the getReadTimeout changes readTimeout values that are less than zero or greater than maximumReadTimeout to maximumReadTimeout. That explains why I was seeing a 20 second timeout. In my client application, I plan to set a default time-out value o

Re: SSL: could not load resource

I have created a patch for this issue and added it to the issue that you mentioned in this email.  The fix allows you to pass a store that is not a valid classpath entry or url string. > > From: Geurt Schimmel >To: "users@activemq.apache.org" ; 'Claudio Corsi'

Fw: SSL: could not load resource

Forwarding to user list... - Forwarded Message - >From: Claudio Corsi >To: Geurt Schimmel >Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:37 PM >Subject: Re: SSL: could not load resource > > >Oh, I completely misunderstood what you were having problems with.  I had >assumed you were talking ab

Network of brokers, idle consumers

Hi, We're running ActiveMQ 5.6.0. We have 3 brokers operating in a static network in our test environment. Here's the current scenario. We have 6 consumers randomly connecting to the 3 brokers. One broker has 3 consumers, the second has 2, the 3rd has 1. When we pile on message to the queue, we'r

Re: Computer sync issue

I guess there is a networkBridge that forwards between the two brokers. if so set the timeStampingBrokerPlugin attribute processNetworkMessages="true" On 12 December 2012 15:08, kureckam wrote: > I have an application that uses ActiveMQ. ActiveMQ is in it's own JVM on > computer 1. The core ap

Unable to get Persistant Messages after Server restart

hi everyone...I wanted to know the configuration of an embedded activemq...where I want the message to be persisted even after a server restart...I have tried with DeliveryMode :persistent both on producer as well as the message...and the subcriber other end is durableCan anybody help out in this.

Computer sync issue

I have an application that uses ActiveMQ. ActiveMQ is in it's own JVM on computer 1. The core application has producers and consumers and also runs on computer 1. There is a UI portion that consumes and produces messages as well. The UI and core communicate via ActiveMQ. If the UI runs on the same

Re: Broker Leak

Christian, thanks. The most recent experiment was run with a much smaller broker, Xmx=360M. I am trying to reproduce the problem I am seeing in a larger system which is not easy to debug. I can't share the large heap dump as it may contain proprietary data. But thanks for the offer to help examine