Re: Strategy for browsing a DLQ containing a high number of (large) messages

2012-12-04 Thread kimmking
The first one may be a nice way. Pagination: count the queue size, view the section. You neednt care about headers or whole messages. http://weibo.com/kimmking From: Marco Zapletal [via ActiveMQ] Date: 2012-12-04 22:11 To: kimmking Subject: Strategy for browsing a DLQ containing a high numb

Re: MQTT and JMS/NMS: ActiveMQ vs. Apollo

2012-12-04 Thread Christian Webel
How do I remove the old connection in a proper way? Just calling removeConnection with the old context and old info does not deactivate the durable subscriptions. if I then call removeConsumers so that the durable subscriptions get deactivated results to strange reconnect behaviour: everytime I

Re: Simply getting ActiveMQ CPP work on VS2010

2012-12-04 Thread Timothy Bish
On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 07:39 -0800, mercuric wrote: > Hi, > can u maybe give me some more informations what i should check? > Some more informations: > - Windows 7 Prof, SP1, 32Bit > - Microsoft Cisual C++ 2010 (10.30319.1) > - MS Win SDK for Win7 (7.1) > > IncludeDirectories: > > a. ../activemq-

Re: How to unlock a queue?

2012-12-04 Thread rafiki
Thanks for the answer. That's what I see: + Producer and consumer are working OK with "DESARROLLO.DATA" queue. + Consumer is unregistered from destination after killing it + Producer freezes trying to send next message. + I Stop producer and start it again. + Producer sends message to other queue

Strategy for browsing a DLQ containing a high number of (large) messages

2012-12-04 Thread Marco Zapletal
Hi folks, I am thinking about an appropriate strategy for browsing the DLQ from a Web application, whereby it is assumed that the DLQ potentially contains a high number of (large) messages. Browsing should support pagination (similar to databases) as well as loading only the headers during b

Re: ActiveMQ Send Timeout does not work while simulating packetloss

2012-12-04 Thread kevin_405
With the async property what i do find is that the message is persisted in the local store and then when the Active MQ link is restored the message goes from the producer/broker to ActiveMQ server and then to the received. This works for me as the only message loss is see is if my producer server

Re: ActiveMQ Send Timeout does not work while simulating packetloss

2012-12-04 Thread Christian Posta
useAsyncSend will force the producer to send asynchronously even if the message is persistent. This may not be desired as the client won't wait for the broker to respond with an Ack saying the message is persisted in the store. You could try lowering the inactivity monitor. The default is 3. ?

Re: How to unlock a queue?

2012-12-04 Thread Torsten Mielke
This should not happen. If you enable debug logging in the broker, you should see that the transactions is rolled back when the client disconnects as part of killing it. Other consumers should still have access to the destination and should be able to consume messages. Can you check using jcon

Re: subscription dispatching

2012-12-04 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi Christian, I think this shouldn't happen as message on its arrival goes to every subscription and then is dispatched from there. So if messages arrive in the same order in the topics they should later on be dispatched in that same order. Regards -- Dejan Bosanac -- Red Hat,

How to unlock a queue?

2012-12-04 Thread rafiki
I have the next situation: + An ActiveMQ stand alone Broker. + A JMS message producer sending 1MB message to a queue named "DATA" in a non transactional mode. + A JMS message consumer reading in transactional mode from the same queue. The consumer reads a message and then write it to a file. If i