I'm getting the same behavior using networkConnector as well. Here is the
setup I'm currently trying (I switched to using vm://localhost.)
This one is clearly connecting as well:
17:32:19,530 INFO [DiscoveryNetworkConnector] Establishing network
connectio
Been trying to get ActiveMQ 5.7.0 running on JBossAS 5.1.0 set up to use a
JMS to JMS bridge to copy every message from a queue on the local broker to
a remote broker (both are ActiveMQ).
I've tried numerous setups, none worked yet. The primary JBoss server
processes a request, then uses a ActiveM
I did solve this issue by installing certificate in jre/lib/security folder
using InstallCert . So i am good .
This is the configuration which worked for me ,
{org.apache.activemq.jaas.LDAPLoginModule required
debug=true
initialContextFactory=com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
connection
Sure thing, I'm just going by the text at the top of this page -
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dERWT1Nmc08tQ2RzV29aWElWdjg3amc6MQ
.
If you guys have an existing automated build process it should be a simple
process of hooking into that. Or alternatively modifying nant.build
Hi Dean,
I can't speak to the usage of logos. The legal department would probably
need to be involved in that type of decision, as well as other higher-ups.
Do you have a link to the information on the requirements? It's at least
worth looking in to so we can make a fully informed decision as t
Hi Rolin,
Just an idea, but what about listing the first broker twice in the failover
list?
failover:(tcp://broker1:61616,*tcp://broker1:61616*,tcp://broker2:61616)?...
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:47 AM, rolin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running activemq 5.4.2 with JDK1.6.025 in Linux. There are
Apollo doesn't support the ConnectionControl command yet. I've opened a
JIRA for it here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APLO-270
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:22 AM, dean.ward wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm attempting to use Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ with Apollo 1.5's Openwire
> protocol support. Does an
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 13:22 -0800, sdonovan_uk wrote:
> I’ve found a significant performance difference using Qs between Java and
> CMS/C++ consumers.
>
What is the connection URI used between the Java client and broker vs
the C++ client and broker ?
> Environment:
> Windows 2008R2, Opter
Use SimpleProducer of example, and add "&timeout=100" to brokerURI.When
broker is not reachable, the send function get timeout in more than 5
seconds. How it happened and how to configure the MQ so I can get a certain
short(<1s) time the send function get timeout?
thanks!
Sent message #71 from thr
you have a slow or blocked consumer that is blocking the send due to the
pending message cursor being full. The blocked send will stop the
connection from being terminated.
To have the cursor spool to disk (temp store) you need to reduce the system
usage memory limit b/c spooling to disk is based
10 matches
Mail list logo
