Bleh. I looked more closely. The exception isn't a flow control exception,
but rather a timeout exception:
what(): Error while sending message[No valid response received for
command: Message { commandId = 8879, responseRequired = true, ProducerId =
ID:psbu-jrr-lnx-44893-1341874696684-0:0:1775:0
Hi Tim,
Before I do this. I think I found the culprit. And while I feel strongly
this is a defect, I could also see it argued as working as designed.
I revisited the configuration page
(http://activemq.apache.org/cms/configuring.html) after browsing the GDB
output and noticed the following config
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 15:49 -0700, JRR wrote:
> Hello Tim,
>
> I tried with the latest CPP version, AMQ-CPP-3.4.4. The problem persists.
>
> I've trimmed it down to a test case, and I've gathered some GDB information
> for the lock up, etc.
>
> How would you like me to proceed. Do I post the so
Hello Tim,
I tried with the latest CPP version, AMQ-CPP-3.4.4. The problem persists.
I've trimmed it down to a test case, and I've gathered some GDB information
for the lock up, etc.
How would you like me to proceed. Do I post the source, test
information/results, etc. here?
Thanks
-=John
--
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:32 -0700, JRR wrote:
> Hello Tim,
>
> Thank you for the suggestion. I made this change, but it doesn't quite
> work. I did some investigation and it's an interesting scenario
>
>
> I extracted all of the AMQ code from the product into a small test program
> so I
>
Hello Tim,
Thank you for the suggestion. I made this change, but it doesn't quite
work. I did some investigation and it's an interesting scenario
I extracted all of the AMQ code from the product into a small test program
so I
could more quickly and easily play with the settings. The test pr
Does ActiveMQ supports XMPP+SSL as transport?
Hi,
I have an activemq instance set up with tomcat for background message
processing. It is set up to retry failed messages every 10 minutes for a
retry period.
Now some dirty data has entered the system because of which the messages are
failing. This is ok and can be fixed in the future. Howeve