Hi SuoNayi
thanks for your attention.
I have 3 brokers in production env. One type of messages was found
consuming delayed last week after the consumer app restarted several times.
But the others is ok in the same queue.
After a daytime track, I found the delaying messages is producted to t
After I added one more machine to my networkBroker url then it worked. Not
sure why.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:45 AM, mickhayes wrote:
> Without looking at your specific exception, you say everything was working
> until you changed 2 things.
>
> Can you come back here when you have isolated whet
When I make a HTTP POST request, the "messageID" header is the second header
in the response. When I make a HTTP GET request, the "ID" header is the
fourth header in the response. Will they always have that name and be in
that order? Or should I program my HTTP client to check every header when
OK, thanks for the quick reply
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/pendingMessageLimitStrategy-only-when-topic-reaches-memoryLimit-tp4653022p4653029.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
not currently, if the memory limit is reached then adding to the
pending list will block pending some space.
at the moment, you need to configure a sufficiently low
maximumPendingQueueSize and message eviction policy so that the memory
limit is not reached.
On 6 June 2012 13:49, JacobS wrote:
>
Thanks,
How do I set user name and password to the connection?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/reproduce-a-slow-consumer-bug-tp4652942p4653027.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We are using amq 5.5 and we want to use pendingMessageLimitStrategy but only
if the topic reaches its memory limit.
is it possible to configure activemq to start dropping old topic consumer
messages only when topic memory limit is reached ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.22833
Many Thanks..
It seems i am about to reach my goal...
However i don't now why php stomp client is throwing error with
apache-activemq-5.6.0 while acknowledging messages where in the same code
was working for apache-activemq-5.5.1.
Still checking PHP Stomp Code available at
http://stomp.fusesourc
I suggest you go for the one-destination-per-chatter model, and perhaps
enable automatic deletion of inactive destinations to control the use of
resources in an elastic manner.
Look at http://activemq.apache.org/delete-inactive-destinations.html.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
*Raúl Kripalani*
Princ
have a peek at the xds (schema) for the xml configuration
search for taskRunnerFactory at
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core-5.6.0-schema.html
and you will see that it is an element of the broker
so do something like
...
On 6 June 2012 07:11, tapan.thapa wro
that is usually the result of failover reconnect. An ack is
outstanding on the client and it gets sent after a reconnect. However
the broker has not had a chance to redelivery/dispatch any messages,
so the ack does not correspond to anything that has been dispatched.
The messages either have not y
Can anyone tell me the cause of the above Exception, so that I can correct my
code.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/javax-jms-JMSException-Could-not-correlate-acknowledgment-with-dispatched-message-MessageAck-tp4652919p4653014.html
Sent from the Act
1. Are the 3 brokers networked or not?
2.The broker dispatches the message slowly to other brokers or client?
and how do you judge slowly or not?
--
Wangyin
suonayi2...@163.com
At 2012-06-04 16:24:42,liangwb2001 wrote:
>Hi dear all:
>I'm using 3 brokers in product env. and recently
13 matches
Mail list logo
