I've read this about DLQ:
http://activemq.apache.org/message-redelivery-and-dlq-handling.html
But when I try to use it as in the example (queue=">") ActiveMQ doesn't start
(5.5.1, although similar behaviour with 5.6.0). If I take the attached
activemq.xml and use it as is, I get a working Activ
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> Yes. The term sync you used in the original email is a bit confusing,
> as a message can be only in one broker queue at the time. They will
> get forwarded to the remote broker if there is demand (consumers) for
> that queue on the remote br
Yes. The term sync you used in the original email is a bit confusing,
as a message can be only in one broker queue at the time. They will
get forwarded to the remote broker if there is demand (consumers) for
that queue on the remote broker.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
Senior Software Engineer | FuseS
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> store and forward is massively used, but you cannot sync queues across
> brokers. In network of brokers queue is distributed over brokers and
> messages will be load balanced between brokers.
>
> Could you please elaborate?
If I pub
You can use JMX to see message enqueue/dequeue counts on network
connectors. But the best thing is to see if you see desired rates in
your producers and consumers.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
Senior Software Engineer | FuseSource Corp.
dej...@fusesource.com | fusesource.com
skype: dejan.bosanac | tw
there are two aspects to this:
1) standard jms redelivery semantics. In activemq this is handled by
the consumer, so client side.
redelivery occurs on "transacted" sessions if there is a rollback or
an exception processing the message.
While redelivery is in process, the message is not visible to
Hi,
store and forward is massively used, but you cannot sync queues across
brokers. In network of brokers queue is distributed over brokers and
messages will be load balanced between brokers.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
Senior Software Engineer | FuseSource Corp.
dej...@fusesource.com | fusesource.
Gary Tully uttered:
There should be a single statements element with attributes, so something like:
*ahem*... To much staring and not enough looking, or something. Thanks, that has
done the trick and now all is much better (except for my feeling like a moron).
Many thanks,
Alex.
There should be a single statements element with attributes, so something like:
On 28 May 2012 07:15, Alex Hooper wrote:
> Gary Tully uttered:
>
>> you can set a specific state
Hi,
Can someone help me understand better the way ActiveMQ handles
transactions and acknowledgements?
I need to write a consumer that processes a message. If something
goes wrong or the consumer crashes we need the message to be consumed
again (when the consumer is restarted).
Should I use CLIE
10 matches
Mail list logo