Yes. After further research yesterday, we did
http://posidev.com/blog/2009/06/04/set-ulimit-parameters-on-ubuntu/ increase
the number of files parameter to *10240*. We have hundreds of open STOMP
connections and expect this number to continue to grow in the coming months.
/So, I guess the ques
wrote
>
> /java.io.IOException: Too many open/ files error.
>
Hi,
Have you tried adding "ulimit -n 2048" in the "~/.profile" of the user
running ActiveMQ ?
Can you show the output of "ulimit -a" ?
metatech
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/java-io-IOE
Awesome Gary, this was exactly what I was looking for. Thanks again!
On May 18, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> it is totally dependent on your disk size, when a limit is reached,
> the next add will block.
> The defaults from[1] are:
> systemUsage.getMemoryUsage().setLimit(1024 * 1024
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 08:59 -0700, gauche wrote:
> Hmmm, I assume it is an AMQ issue rather than an NMS one. I just stepped
> through the NMS code and can see that it is not modifying the headers at
> all. If I explicitly set JMSXUserID then it gets sent, if I don't then it
> doesn't. Guess I'm th
Hmmm, I assume it is an AMQ issue rather than an NMS one. I just stepped
through the NMS code and can see that it is not modifying the headers at
all. If I explicitly set JMSXUserID then it gets sent, if I don't then it
doesn't. Guess I'm thinking it is AMQ's responsibility to use the connection
us
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 08:26 -0700, gauche wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get JMSXUserID to pass from producer (client) to consumer
> (server) but am having no luck.
>
> My client is a .NET app using NMS V1.5.0.2194, with STOMP V1.5.2.2508. My
> server is a Java app using (indirectly via an inte
Hi,
I am trying to get JMSXUserID to pass from producer (client) to consumer
(server) but am having no luck.
My client is a .NET app using NMS V1.5.0.2194, with STOMP V1.5.2.2508. My
server is a Java app using (indirectly via an internal framework)
activemq-core-5.3.0.
My understanding was that
2012/5/14
>
> I'm wondering whether or not you've been able to find out anything using
> BoundsChecker or when you might have time to test it? I have access to
> another tool which is not as good as what you have; it will probably take
> me a couple of days before I have something I'm comfortabl
it is totally dependent on your disk size, when a limit is reached,
the next add will block.
The defaults from[1] are:
systemUsage.getMemoryUsage().setLimit(1024 * 1024 * 64); // Default 64Meg
systemUsage.getTempUsage().setLimit(1024L * 1024 * 1000 * 50); // 50 Gb
systemUsage.getStoreUsage
Many thanks Gary! Do you have recommendations for the storeUsage and tempUsage
limits given that our max journal file size is 32mb? How did this work in
5.4.0?
On May 18, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> inline
>
> On 18 May 2012 05:24, Geoffrey Arnold wrote:
>> We are upgrading from A
inline
On 18 May 2012 05:24, Geoffrey Arnold wrote:
> We are upgrading from AMQ 5.4.0 to 5.6.0, and noticed two issues right off
> the bat:
>
> - The "activemq-all-5.6.0.jar" library is now bundled with the SLF4J Log4J
> binding, trumping the JDK 1.4 binding already in our classpath. As a
> w
Maybe some more logging will help identify the root cause.
Enable TRACE level logging for the following packages:
org.apache.activemq.broker.region
org.apache.activemq.network
org.apache.activemq.command
and open a ticket and attach the log if you can still reproduce.
On 17 May 2012 23:32, Chris
12 matches
Mail list logo
