On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 13:01 -0600, Chris Robison wrote:
> Sorry, that was really badly written. Is the .NET client library supposed
> to be able to reconnect itself with the ActiveMQ broker or is that
> something I have to catch and do myself?
in order to have the client handle connection errors
Sorry, that was really badly written. Is the .NET client library supposed
to be able to reconnect itself with the ActiveMQ broker or is that
something I have to catch and do myself?
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> Is the .NET client library reconnect itself so is that somet
Is the .NET client library reconnect itself so is that something I have to
catch and do?
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> I'm assuming you mean set it on the connection factory. I've tried that,
> but no go. The only way I've found to recover from this is to delete the
> Ka
I will soon be replicating everything running on one web server to another,
and using a pair of LVS machines to perform automatic failover.
ActiveMQ is being used to handle order completion messages, which end up
going out through web services, e-mail, and even just writing files to a
network file
I'm assuming you mean set it on the connection factory. I've tried that,
but no go. The only way I've found to recover from this is to delete the
KahaDB on the activemq server and restart all services.
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 11:56 -0600, Chri
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 11:56 -0600, Chris Robison wrote:
> I'm running into an interesting issue. I have a client connecting to an
> activemq server, trying to consume messages and reply to a temporary
> destination set. The ActiveMQ server debug is showing the following:
>
> 2012-04-07 13:20:25,7
To be honest, I tried all those python libraries as well, but
activemq gets into "hung" states for various reasons so I had to abandon
it.
I saw situations where sometimes clients stop receiving messages for no
reason. They need restart, etc. I think its because activemq is a
"stateful" connection
On 07/04/12 16:18, Darren Govoni wrote:
Can you be more specific? What is not working well, and so on
Yeah, sorry :)
I decided to use pyactivemq[0] because the API was really simple. The
strange behaviour I see is that the subscriber doesn't receive messages
if it was idle more than 60 s
Can you be more specific? What is not working well, and so on
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 16:16 +0200, Luis Cañas Díaz wrote:
> Hi there,
> I've been using the Python library pyactivemq during a few days but it
> is not working as well as I expect. Is any of you using a Python library
> to communi
Hi there,
I've been using the Python library pyactivemq during a few days but it
is not working as well as I expect. Is any of you using a Python library
to communicate with activemq? Any recommendation would be perfect .. Now
I'm even thinking about using Java and connect it to my Python code
10 matches
Mail list logo
