Chaitanya-
You definitely need to upgrade from ActiveMQ 5.2. If you aren't
experiencing a bug currently, there is a good chance you will down the road.
Matt Pavlovich
On 2/2/12 7:00 AM, Chaitanya Gupta wrote:
Hi Matt,
Thx for inputs.
I tried failover transport but having one issue. Produc
I'm guessing you still have client-side code problems, which is very
common. I suggest using the out-of-the-box test harnesses available
from ActiveMQ to help eliminate the broker configuration. Try running
100, 1,000 and then ramp up to 100,000 messages through your Master
broker. If your c
Hi Matt
First, thank you.
Second , unfortunely it does not work.
I did both changes in the configuration you had suggested, but it does not
work.
In the first 2 attempts, I was really excited, because it had worked . But
when I did another attempt, it did not.
To give you a scenario : I 'm runnin
Glad to hear its fixed!
On 2/8/12 10:08 PM, Kai Hackemesser wrote:
[SOLVED]
Hi,
I could fix this issue by setting the CacheConsumers property to false.
Everything clean now.
I would say too that the JMS template need some more maintenance. There is
no method to do a synchronous call. Maybe the
Hi,
I’ve the following situation when failover is produced artificially by
killing the master (I´m talking about a master/slave configuration):
Inmediatly after the consumer connects the slave, it begins to receive any
messages that previously where delivered by the master due to the fact that
the
Hi,
this reply is just to ensure the original question is dispatched to the
mailing list.
Regards,
Guillermo.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Master-Slave-failover-Consumer-get-less-messages-it-should-tp4366155p4372871.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mai
can you raise a jira issue for this so it does not get forgotten?
On 2 February 2012 18:21, Ed Keen wrote:
> There has been a discussion on the JBoss 7 forums about errors getting the
> ActiveMQ resource adapter working correctly in JBoss (see
> https://community.jboss.org/message/648857)
>
> Whe