Blocked consumers with ActiveMQ 5.5.1

2012-01-11 Thread Kai Hackemesser
Hi, I'm doing a pre-production stress test on activeMQ and I have constantly issues with blocked consumers. Here is an example stack that I retrieved from the JMX console: Name: defaultMessageListenerContainer-1 State: TIMED_WAITING on java.lang.Object@574ff50a Total blocked: 2 Total waited: 5,

Run ActiveMQ as a 64-bit service on Windows Server 2008

2012-01-11 Thread qt4x11
We were using Tanuki java service wrapper to run ActiveMQ previously. After migrating to a 64-bit server running Windows Server 2008 R2, we're not able to install ActiveMQ as a service unless we pay for the Standard or Professional version of java service wrapper. I read that others were using Ap

Re: PolicyMap api is really bad :-(

2012-01-11 Thread Jason Dillon
On Jan 11, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > there are a lot of examples on how to use destination in unit tests. For > example, how to set default destination policy see > > https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/policy/

Re: PolicyMap api is really bad :-(

2012-01-11 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi, there are a lot of examples on how to use destination in unit tests. For example, how to set default destination policy see https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/policy/IndividualDeadLetterTest.java?hb=true or how to set i

Stomp and message-id?

2012-01-11 Thread Martin C.
Hi, I am aware that there is no way in the official STOMP protocol to get the broker-side message-id of a sent message. But since ActiveMQ supports some other non-standard extensions, is there a way for 5.5.1 to get the server-side message-id as part of the Receipt frame maybe? Thanks in advance!

Re: Prefetch problem/misuderstanding.

2012-01-11 Thread John-MQ
Still having this same issue after testing a few more things I found on these forums... If anyone has any suggestions at all it would be greatly appreciated -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Prefetch-problem-misuderstanding-tp4222551p4285065.html Sent from th