Can you try escaping the '&' character, i.e. replace it with "&",
or pass the URL through htmlspecialchars perhaps?
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Tianchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using ServiceMix ESB, version: apache-servicemix-4.3.1-fuse-01-09 and
> activemq 5.4.2.fuse-03-09 and trying to set up
Jira opened:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3320
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Advisory-MessageConsumed-TempQueue-problem-tp3510067p3518956.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I am using ServiceMix ESB, version: apache-servicemix-4.3.1-fuse-01-09 and
activemq 5.4.2.fuse-03-09 and trying to set up failover for two queues using
JDBC lock system. On the PHP client side, I used the following command to
make a connection:
$con=new
stomp("failover://(tcp://localhost:612
Thanks Gary for the response.
I managed to test it with 5.5.0 and the problem did not seem to happen.
Earlier I used to get the exception on my second listener instance almost
immediately (after about 20 messages). Now I tested with upto 5 listeners
and 100 messages. All listeners were healthy and
Our site appears to have been brought down my our ActiveMQ slave last night.
It's CPU was operating at 100%
so we theorize that our master ActiveMQ server was hung trying to replicate
to the servers and our web
servers were hung up attempting to publish messages. Web requests weren't
releasing th
I've been doing some more digging around in this and I think it might be
related to the ScheduledMessage.AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY property I'm using in my
code. When i comment out that line, my connection count stays stable, but
with it in there, my connection count spikes and eventually drains back dow
Should we configure "prefetch" on the producer side or on consumer side or in
both side.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-stuck-in-queue-tp3244342p3517057.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
so the sql syntax for the update statement used by the locker is not supported.
So we need a specialisation of the database lock statement also.
Have a look at http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-support.html where you
can see an example of overriding one of the sql statements.
But more generally we