Hi,
By default, CachingConnectionFactory only caches a single session, as explained
on the JavaDoc of the class
(http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/api/org/springframework/jms/connection/CachingConnectionFactory.html):
"By default, only one single Session will be cached, with furt
I used Spring's CachingConnectionFactory and found that it uses only one
connection. When we run performance tests, threads are blocked to send
message ( even when it is async).
So I tried using PooledConnectionFactory. Now threads are blocked more time
for getting connection ( creating the conne
Hi James,
On 12 April 2011 07:54, James Green wrote:
> I'm sure this must get asked routinely but for my benefit at least,
> which is considered best: Have many (hundreds) of queues, or a single
> queue of similar messages and use selectors to pick the right ones
> out?
We have in the order of t
I should have mentioned...ActiveMQ 5.4.2/5.5.0, and I'm *not* using network
of brokers. Each broker is totally standalone.
-
Dan Checkoway
dcheckoway gmail com
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Force-a-failover-re-randomize-tp3445497p3445758.html
Sent fro
Hi,
I think you can use updateClusterClients="true" and
rebalanceClusterClients="true" options in your tag. provided if you are
using 5.4.X
Thank You,
Nag.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Force-a-failover-re-randomize-tp3445497p3445529.html
Sent from the
I've got producers set up to randomize to my broker nodes, such as:
failover:(tcp://mq01:61616,tcp://mq02:61616)?randomize=true
Let's say the connection pool is set to max=10. Normally you'd see
"roughly" (randomly) 50/50 distribution to the two brokers, say 5 connected
to mq01, and 5 connected
Gary,
I got 11 files from April 5 (db-9.log - db-19.log), 9 files from April 7
(db-301.log, db-303.log - db-310.log) and one with the current time stamp of
April 12 (db-681.log). Time to live is 2 hours so April 5-7 files are not
expected to be there.
It's now running with debug traces and I'll
We have been experiencing the same Issue and using 5.2.0.
Recently upgraded to 5.4.2 because of this, But I am Not Sure this has been
fixed.
Responding to Rob Davis Post..
I think nothing to suspect with Spring here, because when this is happening
I tried hitting the same queue with a new simpl
What Version of ActiveMQ you are using ?
What is your Client Failover URI ?
Look in conf folder for credentials.properties file and give those details
in slave authentication xml file.
Otherwise go like this ONLY in your SLAVE configuration...
Try witho
Hello all,
i am trying to set up a header in my messages (submitted to my activemq
queue through STOMP) for selecting (in a polling consumer/worker) only items
with a numeric value in this header that is lower than the current
microtime. However, as i understand every header coming from a STOMP me
I tested it further and it is only a problem if we send messages over gsm
with lan it works fine.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-stuck-in-queue-tp3244342p3444072.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To my knowledge 5.5 resolves all know issues with data file cleanup. One
case where seemingly un referenced files remain is where they contain acks
to messages in other data files, so their removal could result in duplicate
delivery on recovery.
There is now detailed trace log messages from the jou
Hi James,
one thing to think about is optimization of memory vs. threads.
If you're going with large number of destinations and consumers be sure to
check activemq-scalability.xml example and read more on a broker scalability
(
http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-configure-10s-of-1000s-of-queues-
13 matches
Mail list logo