Hi there,
We use AMQ extensively in our enterprise to integrate our C++ and C#
applications (CMS & NMS API's, respectively) and would like to integrate
runtime monitoring of the broker into an existing, web-based monitoring
mechanism built into one of our applications.
This mechanism already
Hi Gary,
Many many thanks for taking this issue up and providing a solution to this
problem.
I looked at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3253 and attached
test case. I will download the snapshot release tomorrow ET to test my
scenario again.
Once again I really appreciate you spending
Is it okay to have message lost for non-durable subscribers during
master/slave failovers?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-lost-for-non-durable-subscribers-during-master-slave-failovers-tp3426324p3426324.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User ma
To get more control of the scheduling, you will need to specify the
TaskRunnerFactory for the broker and specify 1 for the
maxIterationsPerRun so that it will move on to another task (each
destination dispatch is a task) immediately.
It may be helpful if you can provide a junit test case for your
Garry, Thanks for the suggestion. With the change, the broker continues to
dispatch everything from Queue 1 before moving onto Queue 2. Just much
slower. I still need the dispatching to alternate between queues for every
message.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.
Anubhava,
have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3253 and the
associated test case. You can try the additional config with trunk or
tonight's snapshot. I will allow temp destinations to propagate a
network and allow the gc of destinations that have just network
consumers, which wi
one thing that could work is to set the maxPageSize for your
destinations to 1 via a destination policy, in this way each attempt
to dispatch will only dispatch a single message.
By default dispatch occurs async, but if you dispatch in the sending
thread, you will get ordered dispatch. That is the
> 3. Time to live : 30 (5 minutes)
I'm not sure and I haven't checked the source-code, but could it be
that the field is actually setting the timestamp when the message is
going to expire instead of the TTL?
Best regards,
Martin
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n3426037/ActiveMQMemory.jpg
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n3426037/AMQ-Heap-GC.jpg
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n3426037/AMQ-OutofMemory.jpg
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n3426037/AMQ-GC.ppt AMQ-GC.ppt
http://act
Dejan,
Thanks for the response. I have prefetch limit set to 1. But thats not what
I'm trying to achieve. What I need is the opposite side of round robin.
Currently the queue will send messages round robin to each consumer from
first queue then go to second queue, etc (my consumer is subscribed to
Hi James,
yes, we should make this be a default JMX port. Can you raise Jira for this?
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-
The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - ht
Hi Jake,
frankly UDP transport needs some love as it hasn't been touched in a while
(as I haven't seen anybody using it).
Any particular reason you chose it over other transport options?
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-
The experts in open source integratio
Anyone has any idea or suggestion about this problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/testing-WebSocket-STOMP-support-getting-occasional-No-transportListener-available-errors-tp2359504p3425025.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble
Try setting small prefetch size (1 or so) so that broker doesn't try to send
a lot of messages from the queue to the consumer in advance. That might help
a bit
http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-prefetch-limit-for.html
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-
Th
Using Ubuntu here, I have run setup which results in a configuration
file. I have to uncomment ACTIVEMQ_SUNJMX_CONTROL in order to provide
username/password.
However, after doing this I get the following when restarting:
INFO: Loading '/etc/default/activemq'
INFO: Using java '/usr/bin/java'
INFO:
15 matches
Mail list logo