Re: ActiveMQ watchdog for a production environment

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:58 PM, ronsho wrote: > > Bruce Snyder wrote: >> >> I have had very good success in using and recommending daemontools for >> the production deployment of ActiveMQ and lots of other software: >> > > Thanks Bruce, this is helpful. > > I've done some reading on the tanuki wra

Re: AMQCPP: unexpected exception

Hi all, Also, if you run a blocking producer (with connection->start() blocking) to a not existing broker, and try to close the producer after a while, the connection->start crash. 2011-03-07 02:27:33 DEBUG (ActiveInterface:671) - ActiveInterface::shutdown. Shutting down singleton manager. 2011-0

Re: ajax handling fast messages

alikic wrote: > > I hit this issue (AMQ-3094) with 5.4.2. Thanks for the great work on > fixing it! > > Is there a way (and is it safe) to apply the fixes for AMQ-3094 to 5.4.2, > or is it better to just grab the latest snapshot from svn? Do you know if > 5.5 is coming out any time soon? > > Th

Re: AMQCPP: unexpected exception

Yes, It's probably the same issue. I've resolved the destructor stucks (partially) deleting connection and session before delete the consumer. Perhaps you should catch a decaf exception that sometimes is thrown. Tell me if it helps you. regards 2011/3/4 Henrique Magarotto > Hi Tim and Oscar,

Re: ActiveMQ watchdog for a production environment

Bruce Snyder wrote: > > I have had very good success in using and recommending daemontools for > the production deployment of ActiveMQ and lots of other software: > Thanks Bruce, this is helpful. I've done some reading on the tanuki wrapper (http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com), has anyone had s

Re: ActiveMQ watchdog for a production environment

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:42 AM, ronsho wrote: > Hey, > > I'm going to run ActiveMQ in a production environment and am worried about a > scenario where the ActiveMQ process goes down. > Do you have any experience with this scenario? Is there a watchdog for > ActiveMQ? I have had very good success

Re: In a network of brokers, Are the broker names required to be different?

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:58 AM, jessezbj wrote: > In the newest version 5.4.2 > > I tested with two brokers with the same names but different ports on one > machine. > > It seems work. > > Are the broker names required to be different? > > what about other settings? > > I am wondering if I can us

In a network of brokers, Are the broker names required to be different?

In the newest version 5.4.2 I tested with two brokers with the same names but different ports on one machine. It seems work. Are the broker names required to be different? what about other settings? I am wondering if I can use only one configuration file for all brokers (assuming I am usi

Re: ActiveMQ time in queue

This is very helpful, thanks! One follow up question - how would the broker behave when the message hopped between two instances? For example, message was put to one broker on a specific machine, and hop to another broker on a different machine (clocks between the machines can be either synced or

Re: ActiveMQ time in queue

Hi Ron, If you want to see how long a message stayed in the broker, you can compute this value by yourself. On each message processed by ActiveMQ, you can find two properties: - brokerInTime: the time when the message arrived in the broker - brokerOutTime: the time the message left the broker B

ActiveMQ watchdog for a production environment

Hey, I'm going to run ActiveMQ in a production environment and am worried about a scenario where the ActiveMQ process goes down. Do you have any experience with this scenario? Is there a watchdog for ActiveMQ? Thanks, Ron. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/

ActiveMQ time in queue

Hello, I was wondering if there is a way to retrieve the time in queue of a message. Thanks, Ron. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-time-in-queue-tp3337589p3337589.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.