I am trying to do a broker setup as follows:
- All transportConnectors are ssl only and all have needClientAuth set to
true
- All networkConnectors are over ssl and the endpoint also requires
ClientAuth
I need to find a way to have the transportConnectors and the
networkConnectors use DIFFERENT
Dirk,
You are my hero, thank you! I will certainly take a look at your slides at
the office tomorrow, but the simple confirmation that 1000/sec should be
manageable via the JDBC option means I get to make our operations guy happy
tomorrow. They are already pretty good at setting up HA mysql, as l
I'm new to using ActiveMQ and the community so I'm not entirely sure about
how to go about submitting bug reports or patches...
I have a project where I'm trying to use a BrokerService with the
DiscardingDLQBrokerPlugin in code, and I don't want/need the log messages
created for the number of di
The adapter depends only on sencha-touch.js. I think it should also work with
plain sencha (not touch), but I didn't test it. Sure, I can post the code.
How do I open a ticket?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Problem-using-Ajax-to-listen-to-a-queue-topic-t
D'OH!!!
The hyperlink has vanished for the slides, look here:
fusesource.com/collateral/download/74/
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Dirk Fröhner wrote:
> Hi wezhall,
>
> yes, when you want to have an HA JMS node, you will need to chose the "real"
> architecture: Master and slave using a shared
Hi wezhall,
yes, when you want to have an HA JMS node, you will need to chose the "real"
architecture: Master and slave using a shared persistence layer in two ways:
a) as mutex to determine which process is master and which process is slave and
b) for sharing the storage for the persistent queue
Hello folks,
I have been reading the documentation for a little while but I still think I
am only about 80% when it comes to understanding the HA options.
I have a requirement to handle around 1000 msg per second, without loss, in
a fault tolerant manner.
Pure master/slave seems out due to th
I think your best bet is to implement a shared file system or DB master
slave.
http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
If you want to be real adventurous, check out QSandra; A Cassandra backed
PersistenceAdapter for ActiveMQ.
https://github.com/ticktock/qsandra#readme
You're not doing anything wrong. The broker creates the destinations
on-demand or you can configure the broker to create the destinations on
startup. For example:
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";>
-
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com/
--
View this message i
I'll throw Zabbix into the mix. Saw it being used at a client site to monitor
AMQ and was very impressed.
I use v1.6 of JConsole for all my testing and developing.
-
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Your-favorite-AMQ-
Albrecht,
to infinitely try to obtain the lock on the shared persistence layer is exactly
a slave's job. It does nothing else before that happens. The process that has
the lock automatically is the master, the process that waits for the lock
automatically is the slave. This applies to all addit
Great to hear that. Thanks for reporting back and closing the loop.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
-
FuseSource - The experts in open source integration and messaging.
Email: dej...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/dejanb
ActiveMQ in Action - http://w
The fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2683 seems to have done
the trick. Nightlies now properly do topic PFC.
Regards,
Maarten
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3173521.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Use
I have MySQL 5.1, I have InnoDB-Tables, but Slaves do not start up. The first
process becomes master. The others block while trying to become master. They
never become slaves. They try to execute
SELECT * FROM ACTIVEMQ_LOCK FOR UPDATE.
This waits for the lock to be available and finally ends w
Hello everyone,
I have a cluster of tomcats. I use Spring 3. I need to distribute some load
across the nodes. I want to use JMS for that and ActiveMQ for JMS.
As far as I have read, failover with master/slave should me the way to go
for me. Maybe I am already wrong there?
1) I do not want any
15 matches
Mail list logo