I m using 'apache-activemq-5.1.0' and have one producer and one consumer in
my application. The ActiveMq conf file has the following setting
When our consumer starts, the messageBroker it connect
After adding some outputs, the error seems to happen after the socket of the
server side received the wireformatinfo, then on the next call of
readCommand, it fails to read bytes ...
-->
2010-12-17 10:42:13,046 INFO [TcpTransport] BEGIN TAG [1292553733046-99-1]
Receive command [LOCAL [/127.0.0.1
Hi,
I am using Geronimo 2.1.7, which shipped ActiveMQ 4.1.2, it sometimes
reported the error below after deploying a MDB. I know that ActiveMQ 4.1.2
is a very very old version, but
I hope some one could help to give some hints, so that I could port some
changes from the trunk.
Thanks.
On Dec 15, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> Hey Alex,
>
> seems like http client should this job automatically
>
> http://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/cookies.html
>
> did you try some of this methods?
I thought I had. I was using RestTest.java as a model.
Your link helped me realiz
Just Curious...
Is ActiveMQ 5.4.2 compliant against the JMS TCK?
Is every ActiveMQ version tested agains the JMS TCK? If not which ones were
(out of the concrete set of releases)?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-ActiveMQ-5-4-2-compliant-aga
I took a look at the XAPooledConnectionFactory, but I am struggling to
understand how I could use this when connecting to the broker from a
glassfish container via the activemq jca resource adapter. Is this
configurable within the resource adapter or jca connection pool somehow?
--
View this mess
On the main screen, what do the following counters relate to:
"Store percent used"
"Memory percent used"
Temp percent used"
Is there documentation for this web page (http://localhost:8161/admin/)?
Also, anyone know how to test this three counters? That is create activity
to so the values aren'
Hi,
I have been busy with other stuff so I have not been able to focus on this
problem until now.
For now I have not been able to create a test case that could reproduce this
problem. However I have continued my investigations. I once again made
ActiveMQ log everything and found something that c
here is the ra.xml I use:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n3090748/ra.xml ra.xml
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-throughput-after-several-hundred-messages-tp3082431p3090748.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble
I am using a prefetch of 0. This has been configured in the ra.xml in the
activemq resource adapter we use to connect up to glassfish. I configured
this by adding "&jms.prefetchPolicy.all=0" to the connection url. Just
for good measure I also added the following into the ra.xml as well:
what prefetch value are you using?
http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-prefetch-limit-for.html
On 16 December 2010 11:08, robert.sl...@misys.com
wrote:
>
> Thanks Reynald, that utility could be useful. I think I have already pinned
> down this problem to be opening and closing of connections t
Thanks Reynald, that utility could be useful. I think I have already pinned
down this problem to be opening and closing of connections to the broker. If
I share a single or a couple of connections for all processing, I do not get
the broker slowdown issue. Unfortunately, our application runs in Gl
What you describe seems very reasonable. Would it be possible to
codify what you are experiencing in the form of a test case?
There is some good starting point code in some of the existing unit
tests, eg:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/n
13 matches
Mail list logo
