Hi
I am trying to determine how many many queues should be required to support
a typical Request/Response Web Service call over JMS via Apache MQ.
Initially I thought I would need 2. However, after doing a quick test it
seems like I only need 1. I had thought that in JMS a message can only be
re
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 04:51 -0700, sodandk wrote:
> Just took a look at our productionserver:
>
> uptime: 25d 21h 30m
> number of cms message sent/received: 87521919
>
> so 87 million messages sent and received over 25 days...
> and running stable :-)
>
> multiple queues and topics and lots of d
Just took a look at our productionserver:
uptime: 25d 21h 30m
number of cms message sent/received: 87521919
so 87 million messages sent and received over 25 days...
and running stable :-)
multiple queues and topics and lots of different types of messages...
Søren
--
View this message in cont
Hi devnull,
did you make sure that your Java consumers do eventually ACK messages (i.e. is
it ensured that onMessage() does always return)? You should also have a look at
the subscription properties on that destination in jconsole.
Glück auf,
Dirk
On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:09 AM, devnull wrote:
If you can live with possible message loss, which seems to be the case
if the client does not want to wait then use the ActiveMQ connection
factory property useAsyncSend.
For persistence messages this defaults to false, such that the client
waits till the message is stored, but when true, even pers
The selectors are irrelevant, an exclusive consumers will starve all
other consumers. The only consumers that can get in ahead of it are
other exclusive consumers with higher priority.
On 29 October 2010 08:46, ChrisB wrote:
>
> Furthermore, and I realise this is probably not particularly good et
Furthermore, and I realise this is probably not particularly good etiquette,
but I have another question:
How does exclusive consumer usage affect selectors?
I have a central "bus" within my application architecture, represented by a
single queue. Different nodes with different purposes (who all
