Hi all,
I'm having a very odd problem when I try to mix libxml and
libactivemq-cpp. I was hoping that someone on the mailing list might
be able to help.
I've isolated the problem to a simple example. It consists of the following:
#include "libxml/parser.h"
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
xm
It looks like specifying JMX properties with a unique port in each of the
instance's start scripts (i.e., broker1/bin/broker1, broker2/bin/broker2, ...)
may resolve this. I also commented out the JMX properties in bin/activemq
since I've defined it for the instances.
Phil
-Original Messag
Hi Dejan,
Thanks a lot for creating the Jira and submitting the fix so quickly. I had
made the same change in the bin/activemq script to use $ACTIVEMQ_BASE for the
ACTIVEMQ_CONFIG_DIR and ACTIVEMQ_DATA_DIR. I've also rebuilt activemq-console
and am using the new jar.
This allows multiple ins
Hi,
We are trying to create a bridge with IBM Websphere Queue and ActiveMQ queue.
We have defined a broker in activemq.xml with following jmsBridgeConnectors
information:
We are getting below error with activemq 5.4.0 and it works fine with version
5.2.0:
com.ibm.msg.client.jms.Detailed
Normally I can create a MessageDrivenBean *.jar and deploy it into the /lib
sub-folder of ActiveMQ.
It will be automatically managed when ActioveMQ starts and receives incoming
message in its
onMessage()
method. Fine.
But how can I use MessageDrivenBeans when I have/want to deploy them on a
Am 14.10.2010 14:52, schrieb LucDP:
Norman Maurer-3 wrote:
Maybe you could try to add the following jar to the classpath:
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec/1.0.1/geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0.1.jar
This works !!!
Tha
Norman Maurer-3 wrote:
>
> Maybe you could try to add the following jar to the classpath:
>
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec/1.0.1/geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0.1.jar
>
>
This works !!!
Thanks
--
View this message
Maybe you could try to add the following jar to the classpath:
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec/1.0.1/geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0.1.jar
Not sure if it will help..
Bye,
Norman
Am 14.10.2010 14:28, schrieb Gary Tully:
see
Update on this
I used a QueueBrowser in another Thread to browse the Queue. Since my
Producer is also a MessageListener, the trick was to use two different
sessions.
When I used the same session (as the one used in onMessage) the QueueBrowser
returned Enumeration with infinite lengt
seems to be an issue, but there has been no real investigation to
date. add what ever you find to
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2639
On 14 October 2010 12:51, LucDP wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem running ActiveMQ 5.4.1 with IBM JDK 1..5.
>
> When I start activeMQ I get the fo
Hi Phil,
this should be now fixed. See
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2975 for more details.
Thanks for reporting
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://
Hi,
I have a problem running ActiveMQ 5.4.1 with IBM JDK 1..5.
When I start activeMQ I get the following output and none of the webservices
are available ex http://localhost:8161/admiin -> error 503
C:\java\activemq\apache-activemq-5.4.1>bin\activemq
Java Runtime: IBM Corporation 1.5.0 C:\Progr
Hi guys!
I'm also interested. Honestly, I could not find any prof that sessions are
pooled.
We have integration done according to ActiveMQ instruction. So, JBoss JCA
configured in "activemq-jms-ds.xml" file. All the tests show that pool size
defined under affects connections pooling only.
Is
yes it does.
On 14 October 2010 06:26, Alexander__5 wrote:
>
> Hello I need to know whether active mq resource adapter supports session
> pooling
> when used in jboss or not.
> Thanks in advance
> Alik
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Does-resource-ada
great that that helped. I don't think there is a need to adjust
prefetch at runtime.
The rate a which a prefetch is consumed is directly proportional to
the speed of the consumer,
so faster consumers will always get more messages and the messages
will go elsewhere if it slows down.
On 13 October 2
15 matches
Mail list logo