Re: messages sent via stomp are not received in ajax client

On Jul 9, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Alex Dean wrote: On Jul 9, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Alex Dean wrote: I have a Ruby script which publishes a message to an ActiveMQ topic via Stomp. I'm attempting to send these messages to the topic used by the demo chat.html included in ActiveMQ, so I'm using the XM

Re: messages sent via stomp are not received in ajax client

On Jul 9, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Alex Dean wrote: I have a Ruby script which publishes a message to an ActiveMQ topic via Stomp. I'm attempting to send these messages to the topic used by the demo chat.html included in ActiveMQ, so I'm using the XML message format expected by that page. chat.

messages sent via stomp are not received in ajax client

I have a Ruby script which publishes a message to an ActiveMQ topic via Stomp. I'm attempting to send these messages to the topic used by the demo chat.html included in ActiveMQ, so I'm using the XML message format expected by that page. chat.html is this one : http://fisheye6.atlassian.com

Re: Broker clustering with Mutlicast not working

Can u use the 0.0.0.0 wildcard or ip address in the transport connector instead of localhost. A network is store nd forward, not replication, so a message will only be on one of the brokers. On Friday, July 9, 2010, wrote: > I have two brokers, both embedded inside JBoss running on two different

Message Groups and ActiveMQ network of brokers

Hi, I found an old message on this mailing list stating: >>I don't want to load balance across brokers; I want sticky load balancing >>across consumers, with failover. I have a network-of-brokers. The message >>groups documentation (http://activemq.apache.org/message-groups.html) says I >>can use

Broker clustering with Mutlicast not working

I have two brokers, both embedded inside JBoss running on two different machines within the same network. I have the following network and transport settings for the brokers: Broker1: Broker2: When i run the two brokers with these

Re: help with ajax

I've discovered my problem stems from Apache's proxy configuration, not from ActiveMQ itself. When I loaded the HTML test page directly from ActiveMQ/Jetty, rather than from Apache, the example ajax scripts worked perfectly. They only failed when I loaded the HTML from Apache, and let Apac

Re: some broker can't join network of brokers

they should have unique names as some if the smarts to suppress loopbacks depend on unique broker ids On 9 July 2010 10:22, scow wrote: > > b2,b3,b4 have the same broker name 'dynamic-broker1', b1 and b5 get the > broker name 'dynamic-broker1', if they all use the same broker name, the > situatio

Re: some broker can't join network of brokers

b2,b3,b4 have the same broker name 'dynamic-broker1', b1 and b5 get the broker name 'dynamic-broker1', if they all use the same broker name, the situation is the same, I have test it. http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; brokerName="dynamic-broker2" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data"> G

Re: 5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

I have another error with Running org.apache.activemq.usecases.ExpiredMessagesWithNoConsumerTest Tests run: 7, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 138.842 sec <<< FAILURE! 2010-07-09 11:01:45,548 [main ] INFO BrokerService - ActiveMQ JMS Message Brok

Re: some broker can't join network of brokers

have they all got unique brokerName attributes? On 9 July 2010 09:10, scow wrote: > > I have configured a network of brokers(cluster) use dynamic discovery. The > typical configuration is > >         >                      dynamicOnly="true" >            networkTTL="3" >            prefetchSize="

Re: 5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

That particular test is under investigation on trunk at the moment as it seems to fail reproducible now rather than intermittently. It may makes sense for you to add a local exclude the the surefire target in the activemq-core pom.xml for that test so that it does not hamper further testing on your

activemq openwire and stomp queue

i have 2 different client protocol using openwire and stomp on my activemq.xml i create 2 transport connector below My client A using stomp protocol connect to /queue/emonClient/request on port 61613. client A can send message to server in queue emonC

Re: 5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

I experienced a "File system full" on the current file system during the test. I don't know if that can have an impact on it But Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > Hi > > I try to compile and test ActiveMQ 5.3.2 source using Maven. Nothing more. > > The AMQ2149Test is blocked with this l

Re: Strange behavior using failover and network of broker

Hi Cobrien, and thanks for you answer, In my understanding, I set networkTTL equal to 1 because we need only one hop to forward one produced message to a consumer, connected anywhere. Let say's PubA sends on TEST topic using BROKER1, if Sub1, Sub2, Sub3 are respectively connected to TEST Topic u

some broker can't join network of brokers

I have configured a network of brokers(cluster) use dynamic discovery. The typical configuration is There are 5 brokers in the cluster. 3 brokers(b2-b4) work well, other two(b1 and b5) can't join the cluster, they are started like sing

Re: 5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

Some new traces now ... 2010-07-09 09:44:24,986 [Timer-0] INFO TransportConnection - The connection to '/127.0.0.1:41781' is taking a long time to shutdown. 2010-07-09 09:44:29,990 [Timer-0] INFO TransportConnection - The connection to '/127.0.0.1:41781' is

5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

Hi I try to compile and test ActiveMQ 5.3.2 source using Maven. Nothing more. The AMQ2149Test is blocked with this log traces. 2010-07-09 09:15:17,164 [127.0.0.1:61617] WARN FailoverTransport - Transport failed to tcp://localhost:61617 , attempting to automatically recon nect due