I saw some warning when start the web application, not sure what it means:
2010-05-20 08:53:45.750:WARN::Skipping PostConstruct annotation on
org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.start: throws checked exceptions
2010-05-20 08:53:45.750:WARN::Skipping PreDestroy annotation on
org.apache.activ
Hi,
I have a very basic configuration and did a quick test.
I am using Spring 3.0, ActiveMQ 5.4, Jetty 7.0.2.
web.xml
==
SpringAMQ
org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet
contextConfigLocation
/WEB-INF/spring/app-config.xml
1
SpringAMQ
/app/*
org.apache.activemq.b
We are occasionally getting negative pending queue counts using ActiveMQ
v5.1. We're using jms.useAsyncSend=true, jms.prefetchPolicy.queuePrefetch=0,
and we're running tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of messages
through an hour at top capacity. Ended up running across this ticket
https:
Hi All,
I have 2 brokers running in two diffrent network with firewall in between. I
have static ip address specified to connect to each other. If I add another
broker to this cluster then I need to add this new ip address to this cluser
of network configuration.
To avoid this I am thinking if
Hi All,
Rather new to the JMS as a whole. I am using the ActiveMQ-CPP (3.1.2) client
to connect to the ActiveMQ server (5.3.2).
I am receiving my own messages, and would like to stop! I am using code
extended from one of the examples
(http://activemq.apache.org/cms/example.html).
I am using top
I'd like to implement an authorization plugin that would allow me to
implement a fully automatic authorization policy. Here's an outline of what
I want:
We have a broker that is a hub in a hub & spoke topology network of brokers.
A connections to this hub broker are via SSL and the hub broker requ
Hi
I am not using a master slave configuration
it a peer-peer
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Duplicate-messages-with-a-Durable-Subscriber-with-networked-brokers-tp27827251p28609396.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We are not aware of any consumers having trouble. No exception or
similar. We use one connection and several consumers on the queues.
But we have enabled the master/slave only a short while before these
problems came up. Before this configuration, we had zero problems at
all (only with KahaDB but
The master is blocked on a write, is some consumer having trouble? Would be
interested to know the state of the process on the other end of that
connection.
That pending write is blocking the next message dispatch on that connection.
"ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher: /127.0.0.1:59497" daemon prio=
I am a collegue of Andreas. It happened again on tuesday but again we don't
know the reasons. Attached are two thread dumps. I cannot see anything in
it, but maybe you are seeing more.
http://old.nabble.com/file/p28607920/dumps.zip dumps.zip
We had also problems with KahaDB before which forced
Hi all,
some time ago I needed to collect some statistical information from some
queues and I did some tests with JMX integration in my java application and
It worked fine. Some days ago I updated my application to Activemq 5.3.2 and
I found it was possible to collect the same information using
that's good news. I saw a snapshot, so I guess I can use that for testing
purpose for now.
rgds,
canal
From: Rob Davies
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Wed, May 19, 2010 1:02:20 PM
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ and Jetty 7.0.2
Jetty 7 will be supported in releas
I wrote code to test multiple consumers with same selector under P2P. The
message from producer will be sent to different consumers by turns.
Cristian Botiza wrote:
>
> On a different note...
> The original post mentioned P2P (that is Queues), the examples are about
> Topics (pub sub).
> In the
Thanks for your help!
Sebastian Rodriguez-2 wrote:
>
> Hi alan,
> For the Selectors in C#, you can find the following snippet:
> <--- start producer side code -->
> ///
> /// True if the publisher has a selector. False otherwise
> ///
> ///
> /// true i
Got it!
Thank you very much!
Cristian Botiza wrote:
>
> Session session = ...;
> MessageProducer producer = session.createProducer(destination);
>
> producer.setTimeToLive(timeToLiveInMilliseconds); //use the producer API
> to set TTL
>
> Message message = session.create...Message(...);
>
>
Hi,
I've a network-of-brokers/clusters which are statically
defined(e.g.Broker-A, Broker-B) which has a durable Topic(Topic-A). Both
Broker-A and Broker-B are publishing message to the durable topic-Topic A.
There is a problem of missing message, that when Broker-B is restarted, the
messages pub
Oups, my bad, I didn't realize it was for queues.
I'm not really experienced when it comes to queues, but if it works
similarly than with the topics, the message will go to the first consumer
that can consume the message.
On 19 May 2010 16:46, Cristian Botiza wrote:
> On a different note...
> Th
On a different note...
The original post mentioned P2P (that is Queues), the examples are about Topics
(pub sub).
In the case of P2P there is at most one receiver that gets the message anyways.
Was wondering
if selectors are trully useful in this case, especially with multiple consumers.
When Act
Hi alan,
For the Selectors in C#, you can find the following snippet:
<--- start producer side code -->
///
/// True if the publisher has a selector. False otherwise
///
///
/// true if this instance is selector; otherwise,
false.
///
publ
Session session = ...;
MessageProducer producer = session.createProducer(destination);
producer.setTimeToLive(timeToLiveInMilliseconds); //use the producer API to set
TTL
Message message = session.create...Message(...);
producer.send(message);
TTL has nothing to do with message selectors; I fo
Hi Mohan,
can you send your entire activemq.xml ?
I think it could be caused by Jetty connecting to activemq for the
admin webapp. Firstly could you try and disable Jetty completely and
see if the problem goes way.
cheers,
James.
--
On 19 May 2010 00:19, mvtiru wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am trying t
hi,
do you face any problems with the network of brokers, when the brokers get
disconnected and then gets reconnected again?.
in a 2 nodes, network-of-brokers when the 2 brokers gets disconnected due to
a communication failure, will each of the brokers acquire the lock to become
the master..late
22 matches
Mail list logo